DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: ‘444-09
20 November 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
“States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |
application on 16 October 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. ,
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 5
February 2001. On or about 11 May 2003 you were charged with
theft of a government computer. On 8 August 2003, you were
discharged by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a
serious offense presumably, the theft of the computer. You
received a general discharge, and were assigned a reentry code of .
RE-4.
The Board carefully considered your unsubstantiated contention to
the effect that you were falsely accused of stealing a computer,
but found that insufficient to warrant upgrading your discharge
or changing its basis.
The Board concluded that as the assignment of a reentry code of
RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of
misconduct, there is no basis for any corrective action in your
case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request. oO
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
in this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02458-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, On 3 November 1993 the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed your command that you did not qualify for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00356-09
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 7 After careful and conscientious congideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 13 June 2003, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10414-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04816-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 6 November 2003 at age 19. He pointed out that he was surprised when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09446-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An average of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your discharge for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02156-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 October 2001 at age 17. However, the reason for discharge entered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10392-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that your discharge should not be changed due to your misconduct and drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04925-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 7 May 1991 a second special court-martial convened and found you guilty of unauthorized absences totaling 142 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10608-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2003. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your theft of pills and other misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03505-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 23 February 2001 you received a general discharge by reason of...