Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00336-09
Original file (00336-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 REC

Docket No: 00336-09
6 November 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United.
States Code, section 1552. . ve

‘A three-member panel of ‘the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 October 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative -
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted. of
your application, together with all material submitted in support

thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies. 7 ,

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on

15 August 1989, at age 17. You served without incident until

_1 August 1991, when you received nonjudicial punishment (NIP) for
wrongful use of a controlled substance.

On 7 August 1991, administrative discharge action was initiated
to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. You
waived your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement or have
your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).

On 23 August 1991, your commanding officer forwarded his -
recommendation that you be discharged under other than honorable
conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. On

20 September 1991, the discharge authority directed an other than

honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
You were so discharged on 25 September 1991.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, and
overall record of service. Nevertheless, the Board concluded

aa

a
EE

these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge because of your misconduct that resulted in a
NJP for drug use. Finally, the Board noted that you waived the
right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a better
characterization of service. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the -
existence of probable material error. or injustice. mes

_ Sincerely,

  

Executive Di

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09396-08

    Original file (09396-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 June 1991, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00269-09

    Original file (00269-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of: Naval -Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 August 1991, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09084-08

    Original file (09084-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 18 March 1991, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09361-08

    Original file (09361-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire ‘record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 16 October 1991, you _ were notified of pending administrative separation action for misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11549-08

    Original file (11549-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03220-09

    Original file (03220-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 15 April 1991 the discharge authority approved these recommendations and directed your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06469-08

    Original file (06469-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board further considered your assertion that if you were such a detriment to the Navy, you should not have been held by Navy authorities for five...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02859-08

    Original file (02859-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 19 March 1993, you were so discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10384-09

    Original file (10384-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2010. On 14 August 1991, the discharge authority concurred and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09697-07

    Original file (09697-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...