DEPARTMENT
2 NAVY
WASHINGTON D
This is in reference to your appl
naval record pursuant to the prov
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board
Records, sitting in executive ses
application on 1 April 2009. You
injustice were reviewed in accord
regulations and procedures applic
Board. Documentary material cons
your application, together with al
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious ¢
record, the Board found that the
insufficient to establish the exi
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served ¢
19 June to 2 December 2008, when
erroneous entry, with an entry le
assigned a reentry code of RE-4,
directives.
As your present reentry code is ¢
demonstrated that it would be in
Board to assign a more favorable
there is no basis for granting y4
application has been denied. Thé
of the panel will be furnished up
p
The Board did not consider wheths
should be changed, since you hav
administrative remedies by applyi
Board (NDRB). You may do so by
293 to the NDRB.
rs
r
-
1D
It is regretted that the circums
favorable actio: cannot be taken).
Board reconsider its decision upp
OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
A
¢
NNEX
20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 12499-08
2 April 2009
tcation for correction of your
hsions of title 10 of the United
for Correction of Naval
sion, considered your
tr allegations of error and
ance with administrative
lable to the proceedings of this
idered by the Board consisted of
ll material submitted in support
regulations
onsideration of the entire
evidence submitted was
stence of probable material
n active duty in the Navy from
you were discharged by reason of
vel separation. You were
as authorized by governing
orrect, and you have not
the interest of justice for the
code as an exception to policy,
ur request. Accordingly, your
names and votes of the members
on request.
r your reason for separation
not exhausted your
ng to the Naval Discharge Review
ubmitiaing the attached DD orm
ances of your case are such that
Vou are ontitled to have the
n submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previjously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important ed keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attache
Consequently,
record, the burden is on the appli
existence of probable material ert
Enclosure
when applying for a
Sind
to all official records.
correction of an official naval
cant to demonstrate the
for or injustice.
rerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07398-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. That code is often assigned in cases such as yours, where the enlistment is deemec erroneous because of previously undiagnosed, disqualifying psychological conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06845-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was not persuaded, however, that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02222-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03907-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. The Board dia not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is, on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04263-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record anc applicable statutes, regulations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00418-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00953-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00 CRSDocket No: 953-07 27 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Record s, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07796-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06531-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02485-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...