Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12112-08
Original file (12112-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
: 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5106

 

JRE
Docket No. 12112-08
24 November 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 November 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all. material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and app lacabus statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you served in the Marine Corps from 22
August 2006 to 23 March 2007 when you were discharged by reason
of a condition, not a disability, that interfered you’re your
performance of duty. On 24 August 2007, the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) granted your request for service
connection for asthma with chronic bronchitis, depression, a rib
fracture and a scar along the left eyebrow, and awarded a
‘combined rating of 0%.

The fact that you were tested on 20 May 2008 and found not to be
suffering from asthma at that time was considered insufficient
to demonstrate that you were discharged from the Marine Corps in
error, or that the diagnoses which resulted in your discharge
are incorrect. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such.
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\ end
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Dit r

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07016-08

    Original file (07016-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08350-09

    Original file (08350-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12878 11

    Original file (12878 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2012. In addition it noted that you could have been processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry based on your concealment of what you believed to be a pre-service history of asthma. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06165-09

    Original file (06165-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2009. by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support chereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01543-09

    Original file (01543-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that you should have received a more favorable reentry code than RE-3P, and as you were fortunate to have received that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05056-00

    Original file (05056-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the comments applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08100-07

    Original file (08100-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    08100-0722 October 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your son’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your son’s naval record and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11088-08

    Original file (11088-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, LyQaas W. DEAN PFE Pxecutive Dareator Enclosure wEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05174-09

    Original file (05174-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested report for 1 January to 23 May 2007. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08372-10

    Original file (08372-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 20 August 2007, you were the subject of a medical evaluation that diagnosed you with asthma, a condition that existed prior to enlistment and is not correctable to meet Navy physical Standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...