Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11714-08
Original file (11714-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
- @ NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DG 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 11714-08
27 November 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 November 2009. Your allegations of error and

regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. .

The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 25 June

00: . ssumhary court-martial convened on 21 October 2003 and
found you guilty of wrongful use of marijuana on two occasions.
The court sentenced you to confinement for 20 days and reduction
in rate.

 

On 6 November 2003 your commanding officer recommended that you
be separated from the Marine Corps with a discharge under other
than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug
abuse. When informed of that recommendation, you waived the
right to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
On 26 January 2004 you were discharged by reason of misconduct
with a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

The Board carefully considered your contention to the effect that
you had a problem with alcohol while serving in the Marine Corps
but found it insufficient to warrant upgrading your discharge by
reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important. to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

is DEAN

Executive

  

Copy to: Disabled American Veterans

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04935-08

    Original file (04935-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a result of your prior honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07498-08

    Original file (07498-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2009. It also considered your assertion that you were told that you were being discharged under an “early-out” program and that your discharge would be automatically upgraded six months after your separation from the Marine Corps. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02077-08

    Original file (02077-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 August 1992 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of wrongful use of marijuana.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02030-08

    Original file (02030-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 27 July 1983, the discharge authority directed a general discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and on 5 August 1983 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08120-08

    Original file (08120-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00540-09

    Original file (00540-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice, You enlisted in the Marine Corps and received two honorable discharges from 4 April 1972 to 30 July 1981. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09661-08

    Original file (09661-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 22 March 1984, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. On 8 May 1984 you were so discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01640-09

    Original file (01640-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04952-08

    Original file (04952-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06284-08

    Original file (06284-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 31 October 1983, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.