DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARP FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5190 CRS
Docket No: 11707-08
17 July 2009
This ig in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552 «
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Boara consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served in the Navy from 14 December 2007
to 23 September 2008, when you were discharged by reason of
misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, with a
general discharge. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as
required by governing directives.
As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel wiil be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed,. since you did
not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your
administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review
Board (NDRB). You may do so by submitting the attached DD Form
293 to the NDRB.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Lak
W. DEAN PFETYF
Executive D
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02966-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an-official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10320-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05847-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06330-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10587-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04383-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. AS your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07122-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06684-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07636-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10526-08
"A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...