DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DCG 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 11430-08
25 March 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 January 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 14 April
1976. On 27 July 1977 you requested an humanitarian reassignment
due to the illness of your mother. On 11 September 1978 you were
released from active duty by reason of hardship and transferred
to the Navy Reserve with a characterization of service of under
honorable conditions. On 16 May 1979 you received an honorable
discharge and were transferred to the National Guard.
The Board found that you did not qualify for an honorable
characterization of service on your release from active duty
because your conduct mark average of 2.8 was below the minimum
average required for an honorable discharge. In addition, your
reason for discharge should not be changed since it is clear that
you were discharged due to hardship. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
cyidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
tn this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
y EAN P
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00907-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant upgrading your discharge given your two SCM’s, conviction by SPCM, and failure to attain the required average in cohduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04537-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06670-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your - application on 30 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support - thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04337-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2009. On 27 September 1971, you also wrote a letter to a congressman, in which you stated that your request for a humanitarian transfer, hardship discharge, and general discharge were disapproved, and that you needed his assistance to be discharged or transferred. In this regard, characterization of service for members who are discharged by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07454-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2009. However, an average of 3.0 in conduct was required at the time of your release and discharge for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07491-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, an average of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your release and discharge for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04914-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given your disciplinary action and failure to attain the behavior mark average required for a fully honorable characterization of discharge, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08034-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. About six months later, on 30 December 1966 you received NUP for a four day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and disorderly conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09607-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. reenlistment code was correctly assigned as it reflected your overall performance during this period of active service and the fact that you were not recommended for either retention or advancement. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08848-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...