Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11321-08
Original file (11321-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRs

Docket No: 11321-08
26 October 2009

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive sessiori, considered your ;
application on 21 October 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or initustice.

The Board found that you served on active in the Navy from 30
September to 30 October 2008, when you received an entry level
separation by reason of erroneous entry due to pre-service use of
marijuana, and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4.

Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code to individuals who are separated by reason of erroneous
entry based on pre-service abuse of illegal drugs. The Board
concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry
code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the
interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code
as an exception to policy. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It ig regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to alli official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Loge

W. DEAN ‘PFE
Executive Thi

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00977-09

    Original file (00977-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06010-09

    Original file (06010-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07286-09

    Original file (07286-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2009. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would.be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04797-09

    Original file (04797-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. Consequently, when applying For a correction of ai official naval. record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02895-09

    Original file (02895-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered, your application on 15 June 2009. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy... Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00894-09

    Original file (00894-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded further that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for it to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11121-08

    Original file (11121-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12331-09

    Original file (12331-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01063-09

    Original file (01063-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2009. The Board conciuded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11608-08

    Original file (11608-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...