Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10785-08
Original file (10785-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BUG
Docket No:
4 March 2008

10785-08

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the

United States Code,

section 1552.

You requested completely removing the fitness report for

19 December 2003

Commandant of the
report by removing,

justification,
preparation for)
an obvious issue

(reporting senioy’s

“MRO [Marine reported on]’s failure of

to 31 December 2004. It is noted that the
Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the
from the section F.3 (“Setting the Example”)
(and .
[physical fitness test] is
removing, from section I
“Directed and Additional Comments”), “-

the semi-annual PFT
of concern as”;

Section A, Item 5.a Fitness report rendered adverse as a

function of assigament to Body Composition Program [BCP]

[Marine Corps Or

(MCO

P6100.12) .” Item 7.b.

er] and “-Section A, MRO

is not recommended for promotion while assigned to the Body

Composition Progyjam

(MCO P6100.12) for a minimum of six months

and for his geneyal lack of engagement and productivity while

assigned to recruiting service duty.” and removing,
third sighting officer’s comments,

from the
“and assignment to BCP.”

 

RABY
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 February 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentany material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
Review Board (PERB), dated 3 November 2008, a copy of which is

attached.

 

After careful and |conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board j/found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB.
Accordingly, your japplication for relief beyond that effected by
CMC has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable actiion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence jor other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In thils regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of uvegularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the |burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08027-10

    Original file (08027-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “SECT[ion] A, Item 5a- MRO [Marine reported on] was assigned to the BCP [Body Composition Program] during this reporting period for being outside of Marine Corps physical fitness and weight standards. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00689-11

    Original file (00689-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “however, MRO [Marine reported on] was assigned to the CMC informal 120 day appointment to BCP [Body Composition Program] per MCO [Marine Corps Order] 6110.3 effective 8-Aug- Os .” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01736-06

    Original file (01736-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 12 June 2007, and the advisory opinion from the HQMC Manpower Information Operations, Manpower Management Information Systems Division (MIO), dated 30 January 2007, copies of which are attached. The responsibility to implement this policy rests with the commander ~ not meet the prescribed weight standards, the commander~- must take specific actions prior to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12181-09

    Original file (12181-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, cmc has directed removing, from section I (reporting senior's “Directed and Additional Comments”), “Directed Comment, Sect [ion] A, 8F: MRO [Marine reported on] was assigned to the Body Composition Program (BCP) during this reporting period.” and from section K.4 (reviewing officer’s comments), “due to her assignment to BCP.” By electronic mail dated 10 March 2010, a copy of which is attached, the staff of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) advised Headquarters...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01759-08

    Original file (01759-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per paragraph 500L3d of reference (b), “the RS is required to render the report adverse when the MRO is or was assigned to the BCP ... at any time during the reporting period.” There is no requirement for a Directed by the Commandant (DC) report, or a “special report”. The reporting occasion...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9353 14

    Original file (NR9353 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5198 14

    Original file (NR5198 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removing the fitness reports for 1 January to 25 June 2007, 11 July to 31 December 2009 and 19 May to 31 December 2010. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report for 1 January to 25 June 2007 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] is assigned to the Body Composition Program.” and “SECT[ion] A, Item 5a: MRO is currently assigned to the Body...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10596 14

    Original file (NR10596 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] being assigned to the BCP [Body Composition Program] “ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11161-06

    Original file (11161-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After thorough review, the Board found that in regard to the fitness reports covering the periods 20040202 to 20041231 (AN) and 20050101 to 20050430 (CD), the reporting senior properly rendered both reports adverse. In regard to the fitness reports covering the periods 20050731 to 20051228...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7160 13

    Original file (NR7160 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by changing the beginning date from 1 April 2007 to 14 July 2007 (and filing an administrative filler for 1 April to 13 July 2007); removing, from section I (reporting senior's “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] is currently enrolled in the BCP [Body Composition Program] program." A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...