Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10743-08
Original file (10743-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS

Docket No: 10743-08
6 November 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of. your _
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the. United
States Code section 1552. " “s

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. ©. me,
application on 4 November 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative.
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and'‘appiicable statutes, regulations

and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 5
_Ostober, 1964. You received five nonjudicial punishments and. were
convicted by a summary court-martial and a special court-martial.
Your offenses’ included an unauthorized absence, absence from
appointed place of duty, attempt to violate a lawful order or
regulation, failure to go to appointed place of duty, assault,

failure to obey a lawful order, and sleeping on post.

On 30 November 1965 your commanding officer recommended that you
be separated from the Navy Reserve with an undesirable discharge
by reason of unfitness due to frequent involvement of a :
discreditable nature with military authorities. Subsequently,
you received two nonjudicial punishment for offenses that
Sncluded assault and failure to obey a lawful order. After
review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and on 23 November 1966 you were
separated with an undesirable discharge.

In its review of your application, the Board carefully considered |
your contention to the effeck thal you were 3 victim of racial

\
discrimination and unfair treatment, which contributed to your
acts of indiscipline, but found it unsubstantiated and
insufficient to warrant the approval of your request for
corrective action, Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant. to demonstrate. the
existence of probable material error or, injustice.

Sincerely,

 

nN

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04124-09

    Original file (04124-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of thé Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered, your application on 3 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record ‘and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03843-08

    Original file (03843-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10973-08

    Original file (10973-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON BC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 10973-08 20 August 2009 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10105-07

    Original file (10105-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02082-08

    Original file (02082-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, on 20 December 1991, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04341-08

    Original file (04341-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00596-01

    Original file (00596-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings .of this Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00918-01

    Original file (00918-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for misbehavior as sentinel, failure to go to your appointed place of duty, punishment imposed was restriction and extra duty for 45 days and a $45 forfeiture of pay. On 13 June 1965 your commanding officer...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00119-02

    Original file (00119-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. then vacated,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Jan 25 11_20_10 CST 2001

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your record...