DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
* . WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 10703-08
15 January 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant ‘to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval.
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 January 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support .
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 10 May
1977. You received nonjudicial punishment on six occasions for
offenses that included unauthorized absence, dereliction of duty,
loss of military property through neglect, absence from appointed
place of duty, willful disobedience of a lawful order, and
failure to obey a lawful order.
On 28 February 1979, you were separated from the Marine Corps
with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason
of misconduct. The discharge processing documents are not in
your record.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed ali
potentially mitigating factors, such as your overall record of
service and your belief that you were a victim of racial ~
discrimination. The Board concluded that those factors were
insufficient to warrant the upgrade of your discharge in view of
your extensive disciplinary record. It found nothing in the
available records which supports your belief that you were the
wietim of vacial discrimination. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. ,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09290-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material ‘submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 27 January 1975. You received the bad...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03144-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11821-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It found your contention insufficient to warrant corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03155-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existende of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05173-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. After appellate review, on 4 February 1972, you were separated from the naval service with a BCD and an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13071-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13039-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02627-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12077-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received a discharge under other than honorable conditions on 9 August 1993. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10777-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support - thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted and you received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial on 3 April 1992. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...