DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 .
CRS
Docket No: 10482-08
7 July 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 July 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 10 July
1985 for a term of 8 years. You performed 172 days of active
duty for training during your enlistment, but no periods of .
inactive duty for training. A Record of Discharge from the U.S.
Naval Reserve (NAVPERS 1070/6115} dated 30 December 1986 indicates
that you were honorably discharged by reason of expiration term
of service on that date, as well as discharged under other than
honorable conditions and not recommended for reenlistment. An
Administrative Remarks entry dated 30 December 1986 indicates
that you were discharged by direction of the Commander, Navy
Military Personnel Command, with a discharge under other than:
honorable conditions.
The NAVSO 1070/615 you were issued on 30 December 1986 is a pre-
printed form designed to be used when a Sailor was discharged by
reason of expiration of term of service (ETS). As you completed
‘less than one-fourth of your enlistment, it ig clear that you
were ineligible for an ETS separation. The Board noted that for a
short period of time in the 19808 the NAVSO 1070/615, with
appropriate modifications, was used to memorialize other types of
separations. Due to administrative error, the form you received
was nol properly modified; however, its presence in your official
Military personnel file does not alter the actual basis for your
separation from the Navy Reserve, or entitle you to an honorable
discharge or a positive recommendation for reenlistment.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely, t
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01428-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to reflect recharacterization of her other than honorable discharge of 2 May 1989, 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, Butherus, and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07991-09
“A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, under the circumstances of your case, the code is required since you refused to obligate for further service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01173-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ; application on 1 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is separated at the expiration of his term of active obligated service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011088
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011088 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The DD Form 214 she was issued at the time shows in item 8 (Reason and Authority for Separation) the entry "ETS (AR 615-30)" that indicates she was discharged at the expiration of her term of service (ETS) under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 615-360. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03807-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2009.. On 29 January 1986, you received a substance abuse evaluation during which you denied use of drugs. The Board noted that as a result of your prior periods of honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08426-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00569-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2010. On 25 March 1986, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6984 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reflect that Petitioner served in the Reserve Component for.service segment 2 May 1986 through 30 November 1993. The Board, consisting of eee reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an njustice on 20 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301889
On 28 March 2012, Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS 913) directed NOSC Houston to discharge the Applicant with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service for Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve with a Reenlistment Code of RE-4 (Not Recommended for Reenlistment) and a Separation Code of JHJ (No Board Entitlement). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04078-00
action occurred on 30 June 1987 since administrative separation action was initiated on that same day due to your disciplinary actions, and other than the NJP of that day, the most recent such action was in January 1987, Additionally, it seems clear that some sort of disciplinary more than five months earlier. Point of contact is Mr. NAVMC re&est for removal 118(12) page 12 entries Director Manpower Management Information Systems Division 3 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES...