DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No:
3 March 2009
10452-08
Deana
This is in refere
naval record purs
nce to your application for correction of
ant to the provisions of title 10 of the
your
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member pa
Records, sitting
application on 26
injustice were re
regulations and p
Board. Documenta
of your applicati
support thereof,
regulations and p
report of the Hea
Review Board (PER
attached.
After careful and
record, the Boar
insufficient to 4
error or injusti
coneurred with t
el of the Board for Correction of Naval
in executive session, considered your
February 2009. Your allegations of error and
tiewed in accordance with administrative
rocedures applicable to the proceedings of this
ry material considered by the Board consisted
on, together with all material submitted in
your naval record and applicable statutes,
olicies. In addition, the Board considered the
dquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation
B), dated 27 October 2008, a copy of which is
conscientious consideration of the entire
found that the evidence submitted was
stablish the existence of probable material
e. In this connection, the Board substantially
e comments contained in the report of the PERB.
cy ~
The Board particul
made an independen
satisfactory deskt
that his finding w
application has be
of the panel will
It is regretted th
that favorable act
the Board reconsid
material evidence
the Board. In thi
a presumption of r
when
Consequently,
naval record, the
existence of proba
Enclosure
arly noted that the reviewing officer (RO)
t finding that you had failed to develop a
op/turnover, and that the RO has not indicated
as incorrect. In view of the above, your
en denied. The names and votes of the members
be furnished upon request.
at the circumstances of your case are such
ion cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
er its decision upon submission of new and
or other matter not previously considered by
S regard, it 1s important to keep in mind that
egularity attaches to all official records.
applying for a correction of an official
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
ble material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04431-99
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 July 1999, a copy of which is attached. They were unable to find that you were not counseled concerning your performance during the reporting period, noting that your RO states he is satisfied that your reporting senior (RS) did counsel you. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY h c A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10449-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was likewise unable to find the RO’s portion of the contested fitness report should have been “not observed,” noting that an observed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11630-08
You requested that the fitness report for 10 January to 29 July 2006 be modified, in accordance with the reporting senior’s (RS’s) letter dated 16 November 2006 and the reviewing officer’s (RO’s) undated endorsement, by raising the mark in Section G.1 (“Professional Military Education”) from *c” (fifth best of seven possible marks) to “E” (third best) and section G.3 (“Judgment”) from “B” (sixth best) to *c.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08572-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09484-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08538-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03192-09
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 1 June 2005 to 31 March 2006. In addition, the Board considered the reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 March and 2 April 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10212-07
It is presumed you desire removing that failure of selection as well.Concerning the report for 1 August to 1 November 1999, you requested removing from section K.4 (reviewing officer’s (RO’s) comments) the sentences “He has valuable experience from prior MOS~ [military occupational specialty] billets that he needs to apply towards his current MOS.” and “His ground duties managerial/leadership aggressiveness needs to improve.” it is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CNC) has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12302-08
You requested completely removing the fitness reports for 25 July 2003 to 4 January 2004 (extended from 31. It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report ending 4 January 2004 by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”), “MRO [Marine reported on] continues to seek self-improvement and is developing into a well rounded administrator”; removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer (RO)’s comments),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01480-10
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 February 2010, a copy of which is attached, and your letter dated 25 March 2010 with enclosures. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...