DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No. 10440-08
16 April 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. You requested that you be
awarded air crew wings from the Berlin Crisis of 1961.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 April 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
e-mail furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel dated 16
December 2008, a copy of which is attached. The Board also
considered your letter dated 23 March 2009 with attachments.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The Board was unable to find you should have received air crew
wings, since information regarding the applicable policy from
the period in question is unavailable. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Wea
W. DEAN PFEIEFE
Executive Direc
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07430-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 8 January 2001, a copy of which is attached. In January of 1989, the member was an for advancement to A W3 .The member ’s page-9, contained in enclosure occurred in April of 1989 and in March of 1990 the member still attached to VS-41. It was this physical which found the member, “physically qualified but not aeronautically adaptable for duty involving flying as Air Crew.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08325-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07580-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden*is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08507-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. The Board does not grant the naval flight officer (NFO) designator to an officer who has never held it, as they consider this a matter for cognizant naval authorities. He was promoted to the rank of Commander in November 2000 and has completed more than 18 years of qualifying service towards retirement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09482-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00587-09
™ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (PERS-~- 311) dated 26 February 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09520-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 16 December 2008 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05864-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02809-09
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval -Records, sitting in‘executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 16 April 2009, a copy of which ig attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10087-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 24 November 2008 with attachments (your fitness reports for 17 August 2007 to 29 February 2008 and 1 April to 16 May 2008), a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...