Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09234-08
Original file (09234-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS

Docket No: 9234-08
4 March 2010

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 17 July 1981.
On 17 September 1981 you received nonjudicial punishment for
wrongful possession of marijuana. You underwent psychological
evaluation on 17 June 1983 and were given diagnoses of a mixed
personality disorder, suicidal risk, and mixed substance abuse.
On 3 November 1983 you received an honorable discharge by reason
of other physical/mental conditions - personality disorder.

In its review of your application, the Board carefully considered
your contention to the effect that your reason for discharge
should be changed to posttraumatic stress disorder, but found it
unsubstantiated and insufficient to warrant the approval of your
request for corrective action. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

With regard to your request for correction of your DD Form 214 to
show the Good Conduct Medal, Korea National Defense Medal, and
designation of naval aircrew, you should contact the Navy
Personnel Command, Pers 312 in Millington, TN.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Lo Veer O
W. DEAN 3
Executive cor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05750-09

    Original file (05750-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07329-02

    Original file (07329-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    supports a diagnosis of a personality disorder. documents (sustained irritability, paranoia, not mixing well with people) are seen in personality disorders, including the one (Avoidant Personality Disorder) with which the Navy psychiatrists diagnosed this patient. A condition * The symptoms documented in the mental health assessments 3. meet DSM-IV criteria for a personality disorder -- see Reference The symptoms documented do not meet DSM-IV criteria for (c) either manic, hypomanic, major...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01582-10

    Original file (01582-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your misconduct which resulted in an NUP and a SPCM; and included drug abuse and your failure to disclose this abuse prior to your enlistment in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00485-10

    Original file (00485-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07800-05

    Original file (07800-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your Naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 September 1982 at age 19. You were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07172-99

    Original file (07172-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. While you were placed in a rehabilitation Whether you The Board concluded that recharacterization of your discharge is not warranted given your record of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07428-07

    Original file (07428-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request for discharge for the good of the service was approved by the discharge authority, and you were discharged under other than honorable conditions on 15 October 1981. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02118-02

    Original file (02118-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Shortly thereafter, on 19 February 1987, you were notified that administrative separation action had been initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your use of cocaine and marijuana. Immediate administrative Failure to This recommendation further stated that your two On 27 February 1987 your commanding officer recommended an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03522-09

    Original file (03522-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01733-09

    Original file (01733-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...