Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09202-08
Original file (09202-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE

Docket No. 09202-08
23 November 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record.pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

RK three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 November 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connéction, the Board concurred with
the determination of the Department of the Navy Traumatic
Servicemembers’ [sic] Group Life Insurance Appeals Board that the
preponderance of the evidence indicated that your loss of
ability to perform two or more activities of daily living (ADL)
aid not extend for thirty consecutive days. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

it is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice. I£ you
request reconsideration, you should submit a statement and
supporting evidence which describes in detail which two or more
ADLs you were incapable of performing without assistance for
thirty consecutive days, and what factors prevented you from
doing so, for example, that due to severe pain in your leg/arm,
you were unable to, and did not, put on a pair of trousers by
yourself from X to X, a period in excess of thirty days.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02007

    Original file (BC 2014 02007 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The criteria for ADL loss as it is defined in the TSGLI procedures Guide follows: A member is considered to have a loss of ADL if the member REQUIRES assistance to perform at least two of the six activities of daily living. Initial medical review of the claim the physician indicated that he would allow for the applicant requiring assistance for dressing but not bathing. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPFC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5353 13

    Original file (NR5353 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Ara PAE ee uu ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary Of the Navy SE (a) Title 10 U.B.G.. 1552 (1) DD Form 14° w/attachments (2) Advisory Opinion (A/O) from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) meme Traumatic Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (TSGLI) Co¢rdinator, Wounded Warrior Regiment of 16 Apr 2014 (3) Chronologi¢al Record of Medical Care of 24 Aug 2009 and Radiology j.esults ico fof 25 Apr 2009 Statement rom of 27 Apr 2014 Statement ‘rom of 25...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003979

    Original file (20140003979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's request for TSGLI by the Board on the basis that the preponderance of the evidence supports that he had 90 consecutive days of ADL loss which entitled him to an additional $50,000 TSGLI payment. Because he fractured his tibia and fibula, he required a spanning external fixator for a period of over 90 days in which he required assistance with ADLs from 19 June 2011 through 10 October 2011. The primary reason stated for the denial is "these...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002850

    Original file (20130002850 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant made his original TSGLI claim on 12 May 2009 and he was paid $25,000 for an other-than-total injury for temporary activities of daily living (ADL) loss on 2 June 2009. The available evidence clearly shows he underwent a surgical procedure on 19 June 2007 that was associated with his injuries (gunshot wound) sustained in combat in Afghanistan; however, it does not appear that the surgery for his injury qualifies for additional TSGLI benefits without a loss of ADLs. Absent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021572

    Original file (20100021572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He claimed Other Traumatic Injury (OTI) ADL loss for 122 days due to the amputation of his right index finger and portions of his right hand, and his inability to: * bathe independently (needed physical and standby assistance). The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he is entitled to TSGLI for combat injuries including head and facial injuries, loss of right index finger, and hearing loss, was carefully considered. Neither the available records nor the medical...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07689-09

    Original file (07689-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2009. It concluded that your receipt of disability ratings and a non- service connected pension more than thirty years after you were discharged from the Navy is not probative of your contention that you should have been separated or retired by reason of - physical disability in 1970.Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004344

    Original file (20120004344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The record does not include any medical documentation of the hip surgery except by reference. On 9 November 2011, HRC TSGLI Branch denied the applicant's TSGLI claim stating there was no evidence of ADL loss beyond the initial 30 days milestone. To receive payment under the TSGLI for ADL loss, the loss must be for at least 30 days in duration, the member must require assistance to perform two of six ADLs, the ADL loss must be certified by a healthcare provider and must be substantiated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011584

    Original file (20130011584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    These activities are qualifying ADLs and she was unable to perform them without stand-by or physical assistance from 6 September 2011 to 20 October 2011, a period of at least 30 days. The TSGLI letter stated her claim was denied because there was not enough medical information to support she could not perform ADLs independently and her claim for hospitalization was not approved because her loss did not meet the TSGLI standard (inpatient hospital stay for 15 or more consecutive days). The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001240

    Original file (20150001240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army completed evaluating her TSGLI claim but could not approve payment of her claim for the inability to perform ADLs due to other traumatic injuries (other than traumatic brain injury) beyond 30 days. A Soldier may be considered to have ADL loss if the Soldier was incapable of performing that activity if ADL assistance was not provided. Based on her appeal and the documents she provided she did not meet the TSGLI standards for additional loss of ADLs.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12440-08

    Original file (12440-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19. The Board concluded that your receipt of disability compensation from the VA for a depressive disorder is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, because the VA assigned the disability rating more than thirty years after you were retired, and without regard to your condition as of the date of your retirement. Consequently,...