Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08644-08
Original file (08644-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket No. 08644-08
5 December 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 
   

Subj : eC a a LOT ROE An ENS TIT Pea
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: {1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 Jul 08 w/attachments
(2) PERS-811 memo dtd 21 Oct 08
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected to show eight vice zero award points anda
£inal multiple of "196.21" vice "188.21" on the advancement
profile sheet for advancement to GM1 (pay grade E-6) from the
Cycle 078 February 2006 examination; and that he be advanced to
GM1 from that cycle accordingly.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Rothlein and
Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 4 December 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy
Personnel Command office with cognizance over the subject matter
of this case has commented to the effect that Petitioner's
request has merit and warrants favorable action. They recommend
changing his award points and final multiple as requested, and
advancing him to GM1l accordingly with an effective date of

16 November 2006 and time in rate date of 1 July 2006.

CONCLUSION :

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where
appropriate, by modifying the advancement examination profile
sheet for advancement to GM1 from the Cycle 078 February 2006
examination to show eight vice zero award points and a final
multiple of "196.21" vice "188.21."

b. That his record be corrected further to show he was
advanced to GM1 with an effective date of 16 November 2006 anda
time in rate date of 1 July 2006.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an
appropriate location in Petitioner's naval record, and that
another copy of this report be returned to this Board, together
with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
record, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such
purpose.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was

present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Borin b. (Pade)

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

1 a DD KOR

Fo2_w. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05826-08

    Original file (05826-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the advancement examination profile sheet for cycle 078 March 2006 Reserve to show a higher performance mark average (PMA). The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Cooper and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2008, and pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06421-08

    Original file (06421-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the advancement examination profile sheet for cycle 080 February 2007 Reserve to show additional award points. The Board, consisting of Ms. Wilcher and Messrs. Cooper and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2008, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08028-08

    Original file (08028-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    08028-08 7 October 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: = 7 REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show 8, vice 4 award points and a final multiple of "216.88" vice "212.88" on the advancement profile sheet for advancement to ATI1 (pay...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07181-08

    Original file (07181-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    07181-08 12 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess, Pfeiffer and Zsaliman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 September 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That his record be corrected further by changing his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07145-08

    Original file (07145-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a performance mark average (PMA) of "4.0" vice "3.9" and a final multiple of "175.35" vice "169.35" on the advancement profile sheet for advancement to MU2 (pay grade E-5) from the Cycle 195 March 2007 examination; and that his MU2 effective date and time in rate date, 16 January 2008 and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7581 14

    Original file (NR7581 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100; ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HCG Docket Ne NR7581-14 24 Mar 5 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Recoras To ; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO W NPC memo 1430 (3) Subject’s naval record da Pursuant referred to requesting, i ect ; to update cycle 219 Profile Sheet . b. Petitioner's Final Multiple Score (FMS) is changed to reflect 191 15 vice 187.15. c. That part of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7987 14

    Original file (NR7987 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds _the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. It is certified that quorum was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01824-09

    Original file (01824-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0099 14

    Original file (NR0099 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1l. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman; Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 June 2014 and, pursuant to its reguiations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6811 14

    Original file (NR6811 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error an injustice on 10 Mare . of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...