DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX :
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No. 08279-08
25 June 2009
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C, 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 25 Aug 08 w/attachments
' (2) OPNAV N135 ltr dtd 23 Jun 09 w/enclosure
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the service record page 13
("Administrative Remarks") entry dated 31 May 2006, reflecting
Petitioner failed the Spring 2006 Body Composition Assessment
(BCA) (copy at Tab A). He further impliedly requested changing
the Physical Readiness Information Management System (PRIMS)
data accordingly, to show he passed the Spring 2006 BCA, rather
than failed. OPNAV N135 has made this change to the PRIMS data.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc and Messrs. Blanchard
and J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 25 June 2009, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), OPNAV N135 commented to the effect
that Petitioner's request to remove the page 13 entry has merit
and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 13 ("Administrative Remarks") entry
dated 31 May 2006.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
Matter.
Britta. L. (aon
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN JONATHAN &S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e} of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Wooded.
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03150-09
In a letter of 1 July 2008, in enclosure (1) at Tab A, a Navy flight surgeon stated she should have been waived from the Fall 2007 BCA. g. Enclosure (5) is this Board's letter advising Petitioner that her case had been administratively closed in view of the N135 action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by modifying the PRIMS data for the Fall 2007 BCA to show she was medically waived, rather than failed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03330-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by taking unspecified corrective action regarding the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 November 2005 to 15 November 2006, a copy of which is at Tab A. d. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), PERS-311, the Navy Personnel Command office with cognizance over performance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00183-08
The Board, consisting of Ms. Humphrey and Messrs. W. Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (3), Petitioner provided a confirmation of pregnancy dated 19 November 2007. f. In enclosure (4), OPNAV N135 again recommended denying Petitioner's request, as the pregnancy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07350-10
The Board, consisting of Ms. White-Olson and Messrs. Chapman and Ivins, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 November 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. Enclosure (4) is Petitioner’s response to enclosures (2) and (3), reiterating his request to remove the statement “Blk 36. Due to failure of BCA 2JUN07.” The Board finds Petitioner's request to have the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00668-08
Sincerely, Enclosure 5420 OPNAV N135 05 Mar 08 From: Ms. Heather L. Pouncey, Physical Readiness Program Manager (OPNAV N135) To: Heather Topping, Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File 00668-08 Encl: (1) PRIMS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official data) 1. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05015-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, \Weacs } W. DEAN PFET Executive Dir : Enclosure e,_; 5420 OPNAV N135 12 AUG 2008 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (PERS-3LC2) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMEM TIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12183-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) wath this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the Physical Readiness , Information Management System (PRIMS) data for the Spring 2006 (8 August 2006) Physical Readiness Test (PRT) to show he was medically waived, rather than failed {cardio portion). The Board, consisting of Ms. Willis and Messrs. Bowen and Ivins, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04782-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend no correction be made to the requested PRIMS record. This is an advisory memorandum for the use of the Board for Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09425-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08777-08
In enclosures (2) and (3), OPNAV N135 and the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, respectively, commented to the effect Petitioner's requests should be denied. e. In enclosure (6), the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports noted that Petitioner's reporting senior had declined to submit a supplemental report, notwithstanding the PRIMS correction. In enclosure (9), that office noted the fitness report corrections recommended in enclosure (6} and stated hig SSB request...