DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket. No. 0€746-08
18 May 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 May 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Secretary of the
Navy Council of Review Boards 12 February 2009, a copy of which
is attached, and your response thereto.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
The Board was not persuaded that you were unfit for duty by
reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated
by your service in the Marine Corps Reserve. In addition, the
Board noted that your inflammatory bowel condition was diagnosed
in February 2002, rather than May 2005 as you apparently advised
officials of the Department of Veterans Affairs. There 1S no
apparent connection between the onset of that condition in 2002
and your service in the Marine Corps Reserve.
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
a SAN
ROBERT D. SALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03957-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04567-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board also noted that as a result of your general characterization of service in the Marine Corps, you may be eligible for veterans' benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09555-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the contested fitness report for 25 November 2002 to 29 May 2003. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06850-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 24 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. VIRGINIA 221 34-51 03 IN REPLY REFER TO: 0 161 MMER/PERB 2 2001 I AU6 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06836-02
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 1610 MMER/PERB JUL 2 4 20@ MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD NAVAL RECORDS FOR CORRECTION OF Sub; : MARINE CORPS ADVISORY OPINION ON MASTER SERGEAN PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE BOARD (PERB) OF SMC Ref: (a) (b) MSg MC0 P1610.7E DD Form 149 of w/Ch 1 14...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12000-08
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 22 January 2009 and 26 February 2009 with enclosures, copies of which are attached. In this regard, the Board noted that the favorable advisory opinion dated 22 January 2009 did not acknowledge the information reflected in enclosures (2), (3), (4) and (9) of the advisory opinion dated 26 February 2009. Reserve Affairs reiterates (as previously stated in the advisory opinion dated 16 May...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06254-01
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Y S LCC:ddj Docket No: 6254-01 20 February 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12147-09
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 16 November 2009, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner argues that this fitness report should be removed from his Official Military Personnei File (OMPF) because the Reporting Senior marks are lower than those of his previous report from the same Reporting Senior, and that he was not counseled about the reduced marks. Each report is an evaluation of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00312-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. Subsequently, you tested positive for marijuana on two random urinalyses of 22 June and 2 August 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08384-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 6 December 2001, a copy of which is attached. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation never officially counseled The petitioner contends he was 2. that his performance was or would result in an adverse fitness report. The Board believes Sub-j: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION 0 LIEUTENANT COLONEL OF SMC b.