DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS
Docket No: 5610-08
25 September 2009
From:- Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: FORMER ‘lilejigapagipeess snasnemeausaisiiiaal REVIEW OF
NAVAL RECORD
Ref; {a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reentry code he was assigned on 8 October 1996.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Wp Mc. SMM and Ms.
i: wii oy ewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 9 September 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 30 July 1996. On 30
September 1996 he was diagnosed with systolic hypertension, which
existed prior to his enlistment. On 8 October 1996, he received
an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of his
failure to meet medical/physical procurement standards and was
assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
c. Applicable directives require the assignment of an RE-4
reentry code when a Sailor is discharged for failing to meet
medical/physical procurement standards. A Sailor who is found to
be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the
..alternative,.be separated by reason of erroneous entry and
assigned a reentry code of RE-3E or RE-4.
CONCLUSION: —
Upon review and consideration of ail the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board believes that the reason for discharge should
be changed to erroneous entry since Petitioner was unaware of his
condition when he was accepted for enlistment. Accordingly, the
Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be
changed to erroneous entry.
The Board also concludes that an RE-3E reentry code should be
assigned since there is no evidence that Petitioner had any.
performance or disciplinary infractions during his period of
service and his record does not otherwise support the more
stigmatizing code of RE-4.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 8
October 1996 he received an entry level separation by reason of
erroneous entry and was assigned a reentry code of RE-3E.
b, That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.
4, It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT Dd. ZSALMAN BS R. EXNICIOS
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures #f the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
r
Executive tor
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05391-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be..corrected by changing | the reentry code he was assigned on 28 April 2009. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action, The Board believes that the reason for discharge should be changed to erroneous entry since Petitioner was unaware of his condition when he was accepted for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01260-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1260-09 24 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER i REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 3 November 2006. ni: and Mr. a Me reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05071-09
Pursuant to thé provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by _ changing the reentry code he was assigned on 25 March 1999. Ciiimenen and Ms. MEE reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 20 January 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00144-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 22 January 2008. The Board, consisting of Ms. 4 eee vs. mmmmingss 208 Mr. Willie cov iewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06549-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS : 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRS Docket No: 6549-09 27 July 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD a, a a Ct
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04373-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 10 October 2006. The Board, consisting of Messrs@ a reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6-May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05689-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 : o370 S10aRS Docket No: 5698-09 15 June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for. Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER = iiiis Mm REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form i49 (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09343-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 16 June 2009. 2 a. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found to be not physically qualified for enlistment may, in the alternative,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07121-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval be corrected by changing the reason for discharge and the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 9 August 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. =—eGypr gay 2nd ne reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on January 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. A Sailor who is found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00863-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reentry code assigned on 26 November 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to...