DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 04005-08
7 October 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 October 2008. After careful consideration of
your application, the Board concluded that your application was
not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of
justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in a
timely manner. In this regard, the Board found that you knew on
19 December 1972 that you were being discharged pursuant to your
request, without entitlement to disability benefits administered
by the Department of the Navy. In addition, the Board noted
that you submitted an application for correction of your naval
record on 4 October 1976 in which you requested that you be
assigned a more, favorable reentry code than the code of RE-3C
you were assigned at discharge. You contended that you had
requested discharge in 1972 because of marital discord which no
longer existed, as you had obtained a divorce. You did not claim
that you suffered from a major mental disorder while serving on
active duty in the Marine Corps, and indicated that you
performed your duties well prior to the “unfortunate situation”
that prompted your request for discharge.
You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05707-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. The mititary => departments may assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02176-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You subsequently requested an undesirable discharge (UD) for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the three periods of UA totaling 115 days. The Board also considered your contention that you contracted hepatitis C while in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08356-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 12 May 1972 at age 18. Those regulations also allow for the assignment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00311-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2008. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03034-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 31 October 1972, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to civil conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11265-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06069-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00127-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 9 August 1972, the discharge authority directed that you be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of civil conviction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08235-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, several documents in the record, which were signed by you,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01918-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of GLOn, of your United i Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and your letters of...