DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
‘Docket No: 3888-08
8 May 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your |
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 May 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 1 July 1983
after more than seven years of prior active duty. You were
honorably discharged by reason of homosexuality on 13 October
1987 based on your admission to your commanding officer that you
were a homosexual. You were assigned a reenlistment code of
. RE-4,
As directives in effect in 1987 required the assignment of an
RE-4 reenlistment code to a Sailor discharged for homosexuality,
and as you have not demonstrated that it. would be in the interest
of justice for the Board to assign you a more favorable code as
an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your
request for an amended reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
\
Sincerely,
A\ea§
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06566-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 September 1980. You were assigned a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07895-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire the Board found that the evidence submitted was record, probable material insufficient to establish the existence of error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10614-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In your case, since the activity occurred onboard a naval vessel, it is sufficient even under current standards to warrant an OTH discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04472-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2013. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to ‘demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07712-09
Co A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ... Records, sitting in executive session, considered your °° application on 4 November 2009, Your allegations of error an injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. “ After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05068-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 5068-01 15 January 2002 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. authorized and normally assigned when individuals are separated The Board noted your contention that you lied for that reason.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11214-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 11214-07 20 March 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code’ section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09753-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge and reentry code given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in two NUJPs and your admission of participation in homosexual acts with other Marines on a marine...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05584-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During the period 22 November to 22 December 1986, you were in an unauthorized absence (UA) status for about 30 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02849-05
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge.