Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03613-08
Original file (03613-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JSR
Docket No: 3613-08

19 June 2008

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the

United States Code, section 1552.

You requested removing the fitness report for 1 May 2004 to 20
March 2005 and your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year

2007 and 2008 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Selection Boards.

It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
directed removing the contested fitness report.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in -executive session, considered your
application on 19 June 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance

Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 April 2008, and the
advisory opinion from the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation

Section, Personnel Management Division (MMOA-4), dated
9 April 2008, copies of which are attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion
from MMOA-4 in concluding your failures of selection for
promotion should stand, as your selection would have been
definitely unlikely in any event. Accordingly, your application
for relief beyond that effected by CMC has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished

upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 

Enclosures —
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

 

 

 

 

3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER To:
1610
MMER/PERB
APR 07 zuus
From: Commandant of the Marine. Carp

 
 

    

 

Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

 

Ref: (a) Your DD Form 149 of 27 Nov 07
(b) MCO 1610.11¢c

1. Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board has
reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your naval record.
Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has directed
that your naval record will be corrected by removing the following
fitness report:

Date of Report Reporting Senior Period of Report

 

15 March 2005 20040501 to 20050320 (TD)
2. There will be inserted in your naval record a memorandum in
place of the removed report. The memorandum will contain
appropriate identifying data concerning the report and state that
it has been removed by direction of the Commandant of the Marine
Corps and cannot be made available in any form to selection boards
and reviewing authorities. It will also state that such boards
may not conjecture or draw any inference as to the nature of the
report or the events that may have precipitated it, unless such
events are otherwise properly a part of the official record. The
PES (the data base which generates your Master Brief Sheet) will
be corrected accordingly.

    

ms re
JL ye | oe
ie NY

RANCES S. POLETO
By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08284-01

    Original file (08284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ’s failures C. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC Officer Assignment Branch, Personnel Management Division (MMOA4) has commented to the effect that Petitioner request to remove his FY 2002 failure of selection has merit and warrants favorable action. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Report -__- _____.__...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05333-01

    Original file (05333-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Keport Reporting Senior Period of Report 22 Jan 99 980801 to 981231 (CH) There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. review ailed + Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to remove the Change of Reporting Senior Fitness Report for the period 980801 to 981231. equests...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07185-01

    Original file (07185-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in By enclosure 3. a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at enclosure (3), this Headquarters provided Majo ith Head, "Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 1610 MMER/PERB 23 kU6 20% From: Co To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 1610.11C MC 41 Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board 1. has reviewed allegations of error and injustice in your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04664-00

    Original file (04664-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in request for By enclosure (3), this Headquarters provide 3. with a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained a Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES NAVY MARlNE CORPS ~~~ORUSSELLROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 134-5 103 LN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB I 1 JUN 1006 From: To: :USMC Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05329-01

    Original file (05329-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your last request was not considered, as you have not been selected for or promoted to lieutenant colonel. directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has Date of Report Reportin gSenio r Period of Report 11 Apr 00 There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) to record and e FY02 USMC remove the To He successfully...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04402-01

    Original file (04402-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 3 August 1995 to 31 May 1996, a copy of which is at Tab A. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04707-01

    Original file (04707-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    directed that your Naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report: Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has the Performance Evaluation Review Board Date of Report --- - 29 Apr 00 Reporting Senior Period of Report 990710 to 000501 (CD) There will be inserted in your Naval record a memorandum in 2. place of the removed report. The memorandum will contain appropriate identifying data concerning the report and state that it has been removed by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07470-02

    Original file (07470-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Enclosure (2) is furnished to assist in request for By enclosure 3. with a copy of the Advisory Opinion contained at en (3), this Headquarters provided Ma Head, Performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 1610 MMER/PERB A:JG ?oul ii ; From: Co To: Subj: CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) MC0 161O.llC Per the reference, the Performance Evaluation Review Board and injustice in your naval Having reviewed all the facts of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06974-01

    Original file (06974-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ’s ’s record and C. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner ’s naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of Petitioner ’s naval record. (l), PERB removed from Captain We defer to BCNR on the issue of Captai 2. the removal of his failure of selection to the grade of Major. The memorandum will contain appropriate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09126-02

    Original file (09126-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by the FY 2001 and 2002 CW04 Selection Boards. The memorandum will contain appropriate identifying data concerning the reports and state that they have been removed by direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps and cannot be made available in any form to selection boards and reviewing authorities. unless such events are otherwise properly a It will also state The Commandant of the Marine Corps is not empowered to grant 3. or deny the...