DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
HD:hd
Docket No. 01662-08
22 September 2008
This 1s in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552. You requested setting aside
your reduction from RM3 (pay grade E-4) to RMSN (pay grade E-3).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 September 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated
3 April 2008, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
LiPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
1430
Ser 811/284
03 Apr 08
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via: PERS-31C
Subj}: BCNR PETITION ICO FORM
Ref: (a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 01 Feb 08
{b) BUPERSINST 1430.16F
Encl: (1) BCNR File
1. In response to reference (a), recommend disapproval to the
petitioner’s request.
2. The petitioner is requesting re-instatement to pay grade E-4.
3. A review of member’s record shows a Court Memorandum, NAVPERS
1070/607 dated 09 February 1987 for violation of UCMJ articles 92, 91
and 107. Member was reduced in rank from RM3 to RMSN.
4. In view of the above, recommend member’s record remains as is.
5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the
Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is
returned.
Division Director
Enlisted Career Progression
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04687-98
DEP,ARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 4687-98 15 April 1999 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 1(1-__~ (a) Title 10 'U.S.C. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. RMSN (E- d. Petitioner states in his application that when the command advanced him to RM3, this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05452-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07133-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2008. Per references (a) and (b), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02807-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10071-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner contacted Retired Operations Section (N-152), enclosure (2), requesting clarification on retired status. Per enclosure (4) advancement on the retired list to the grade of CWO2 would result in a loss of pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01099-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10423-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12202-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 July 2009. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval ~ record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR} only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05868-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 05868-08 18 August 2008 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07921-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.