DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 59-08
29 August 2008
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Wei
es:
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552
Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board
requesting that his RE-4 reenlistment code be changed.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. eee Mr. OE and Mr.
Mee ev iewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
c. Petitioner was married on 12 June 2006. On 30 August
2006 he enlisted in the Navy. His son was born on 21 January
2007. On 29 March 2007 he indicated that he could not comply
with the provisions of the Family Care Plan Certificate because
he had no one to care for his son. A Record of Emergency Data
dated 30 May 2007 indicates that his wife's address was unknown.
ad. Since he could not comply with the provisions of the
Family Care Plan Certificate he was processed for an
administrative separation. After review, the separation
authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of parenthood
and he was so discharged on 21 July 2007. At that time, he was
assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
e. Petitioner states in his application, in effect, that
his wife abandoned their marriage and he had no one to care for
his infant child.
£. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3G or an
RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason
of parenthood.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. It is clear from the record that Petitioner had no
choice but to request separation because he had no one to care
for his son. Since the situation was beyond his control, the
Board believes that, in retrospect, an RE-3G reenlistment code
would have been more appropriate. Therefore, his record should
be corrected to show that on 21 July 2007 he was assigned an RE-
3G reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of
record.
The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand the reasons for the change in the
reenlistment code.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 21 July 2007 he was assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code.
b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN “\ GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
egoing corrective action,
(a), has been approved by
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Riga > Teale
eee W. DE EITFFER
Executive Director
taken under the
the Board on
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10755-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Nevertheless, she was administratively processed for separation by reason of parenthood due to her inability to comply with the NFC program. On 23 February 2004 the discharge authority, Navy Personnel Command (NPC), directed a reenlistment code of RE-3B, or a RE-4, if warranted by the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05172-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5172-08 5 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. e. On 6 February 2008 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted her service record and an RE-3B reenlistment code. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07204-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O370-51OODocket No: 07204-06 23 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of parenthood. That Petitioners s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 July 2002 Petitioner was issued a RE-3B reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code actually...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06423-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00TRGDocket No:6423-0722 May 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed.2. Petitioner’s case was considered by the Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11012-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 11012-07 30 January 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW i i OVAL RECORD OF as Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting an honorable discharge and RE-3B...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11054-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on $ June 2009. After review, the separation authority directed an honorable discharge due te parenthood or custody of minor children: and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment .code.-.You--« were so discharged on 13 September 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02109-01
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by changing the 4 reenlistment code issued on 19 April 1985. f. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3B or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged because of parenthood. adverse performance the Board concludes that no it is clear that the parenthood Given the circumstances, Although his command This code will The Board further concludes that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09774-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reason for discharge (personality disorder) and RE-3G reenlistment code be changed. The evaluation recommended an expeditious administrative separation due to a personality disorder that existed prior to his enlistment. Ten months later, on 10 May 2006, his commanding officer issued him a counseling/warning concerning his diagnosed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with Ghd Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance for a Sailor who is separated for this reason, the Board concludes that an RE-3B reenlistment code is more appropriate than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09155-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...