This is ine
naval record
States Code
A three-membe
Records, sitt
application o
injustice wer
regulations a
Board. Docum
your applicat
thereof, your
and policies.
After careful
record,
insufficient
the Bd
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ‘TRG
Docket No: 11089-07
28 August 2008
ference to your application for correction of your
pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
ection 1552.
r panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
ing in executive session, considered your
mn 26 August 2008. Your allegations of error and
© reviewed in accordance with administrative
pC procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
ntary material considered by the Board consisted of
ion, together with all material submitted in support
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and conscientious consideration of the entire
bard found that the evidence submitted was
to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted i
n the Marine Corps on 20 March 1973 at age 17. On
7 September 1973 you received nonjudicial punishment for an
unauthorized absence of about 45 days.
September 1972
punishment on
of unauthorize
two
marijuana,
restriction.
duty with your
conditions.
During the period from 7
to 16 February 1977 you received nonjudicial
nine occasions. Your offenses included two periods
d absence totaling about five days, possession of
instances of disobedience, disrespect and breaking
On 9 September 1977 you were released from active
service characterized as being under honorable
Subsequently, you were issued a general discharge
at the end of
our military obligation.
Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and
proficiency averages,
during periodi
averages were
of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time
a fully honorable characterization of servi
In its review
which are computed from marks assigned
Your conduct and proficiency
A minimum average mark
of your separation for
ce.
evaluations.
.7 and 4.3, respectively.
£ your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
contention, in jeffect, that you performed your duties in an
excellent manner.
The Board found that these factors and
your discharge given your extensive disciplinary record and
failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. The
Board concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and no
change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PF]
Executive Di
4
cK,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09825-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07825-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02287-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct which...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05234-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04777-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08780-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01967-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. totalling $396,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05262-07
Correction of Naval considered your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, application on 15 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05722-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and your failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10129-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of, Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2009. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.