BOAR F
This is in reference t
naval record pursuant
States Code section 15
A three-member panel off
Records, sitting in exe
application on 12 Augus
injustice were reviewed
regulations and proced
Board. Documentary mat
your application, toge
thereof, your naval ret
and policies.
After careful and cons¢
record, the Board found
insufficient to establj
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the May
During the period from
received nonjudicial p
were disobedience and d
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 10940-07
19 August 2008
your application for correction of your
o the provisions of title 10 of the United
2.
the Board for Correction of Naval
cutive session, considered your
t 2008. Your allegations of error and
in accordance with administrative
res applicable to the proceedings of this
erial considered by the Board consisted of
her with all material submitted in support
ord and applicable statutes, regulations
lentious consideration of the entire
that the evidence submitted was
sh the existence of probable material
ine Corps on 30 November 1978 at age 19.
28 August 1979 to 15 January 1980 you
mishment on four occasions. Your offenses
our short periods of unauthorized absence.
Additionally, your record reflects a period of lost time of about
23 days for which there
December 1981, you rece
of your required active
Character of service is
is no explanation in the record. On 22
ived a general discharge at the completion
service.
based, in part, on conduct and
proficiency averages, which are computed from marks assigned
during periodic evaluat
marks are recorded is i
would have been assigne
disciplinary actions.
your discharge, you wer
minimum average mark of
of your separation for
service. The Board bel
was below 4.0.
In its review of your aj
potentially mitigating
Hons. In your case, the page on which the
ncomplete. However, it is clear that you
a mark below 4.0 after each of your
the record does show that on the date of
assigned a 3.0 mark in conduct. A
4.0 in conduct was required at the time
a fully honorable characterization of
jeved that your average mark in conduct
pplication the Board carefully weighed all
factors, such as your youth, your desire
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01385-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of N a n 1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04695-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. The record further reflects two periods of UA from 2-10 June and 22-23 June 1971, for which no disciplinary action is shown in the record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00589-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 May 1954 at age 18. You were issued a general discharge on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09825-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07825-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06769-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 17 January 1975 at age 19. You were retired effective on 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06115-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. administrative discharge stating, in part, as follows: On 23 August 1990 the psychiatrist recommended your You Although not presently considered a danger to himself, he may make further suicidal threats or gestures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05278-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02214-00
He has used alcohol daily, You were admitted to the in-patient rehabilitation treatment program for drug abuse on 20 January 1984. You were so The record reflects denied your request 1994. that the Navy Discharge Review Board for upgrade of your discharge on 4 October (NDRB) Regulations provide that individuals separated by reason of drug abuse rehabilitation failure receive the type of discharge warranted by the service record. and after a week of not seeing your You assert that You...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06337-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...