DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 10680-07
8 February 2007
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 29 Nov 07 w/attachs
(2) HQOMC MIO memo dtd 14 Jan 08
(3) Subj’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his
naval record be corrected by removing the service record page il
(“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 20 July 2005 and,
by implication, his rebuttal dated 27 July 2005. Copies of the
contested entry and rebuttal are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Lippolis and Lucas,
reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 7 February 2008,
and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should
be granted. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
Statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies which were available under existing law
and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. The page i1 on which the contested entry appears also
includes an uncontested entry.
c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the
Headquarters Marine Corps Manpower Information Operations,
Manpower Management Information Systems Division has commented
to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting the
following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing
the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”)
entry dated 20 July 2005 and his rebuttal dated 27 July 2005.
This is to be accomplished by reconstructing the page 11 on
which the entry appears and physically removing the rebuttal, or
completely obliterating the entry and rebuttal so they cannot be
read, rather than merely lining through them.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner’s naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
. g d
Dov Guin J A~Pb~
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN ©
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
RP Re
Y PPETRER |
Executive D1 cy (Noh
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02803-07
He further requested removal of the fitness report for 20 November 1998 to 31 March 1999 (copy at Tab C in enclosure (1)). d. In enclosure (3), Petitioner added his request to remove the page 11 entry dated 24 March 1999. e. In enclosure (4), the HQMC PERB commented to the effect that the contested fitness report should stand. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11d (“Administrative Remarks (1070) 7”) entry dated 24 March 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08514-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 1 August 2005 and her undated rebuttal, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Willis and Messrs. Grover and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06982 12
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 2 March to 31 December 2007 (copy at Tab A) and the service record page 11(c) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 28 June 2007 with his rebuttal dated 6 July 2007 (copies at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Zivnuska and Messrs. Mann...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08488-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board retesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 18 July 2007 and his rebuttal dated 13 August 2007. Enclosure (3) is Petitioner’s reply to the advisory opinion, reiterating his contentions of administrative error.CONCLUSION:Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02415-09
application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1i(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)"} entry dated i? ‘CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board substantially concurs with enclosure (2) in finding the existence of an error and injustice warranting partial relief, specifically, removal of the page 11(d) entry dated 8 March 2002, with the rebuttal dated 12 March 2002, as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04206-09
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070})"} entry dated 27 July 2005 and her undated rebuttal. That her record be corrected further by removing the service record page 11 entry dated 24 October 2005. c. That her record be corrected further by modifying the service record page 11 entry dated 11 April 2005 by removing “This has been your second offense of search [sic] nature.” d. That any material or entries...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05641-08
No: 5641-08 5 December 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Leer) REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11.d (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 6 April 2006 and his rebuttal dated 13...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4745 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O! c. Enclosure (2), the report of the HOMC PERB in Petitioner's case, shows that the PERB directed removing the contested fitness report for 1 January to 27 April 2008, but commented to the effect that the five remaining reports at issue should stand. In enclosure (5), Petitioner provided new evidence in support of his new request to remove the page 11 entries dated 11 June 2010 and 12 May 2011. g. In enclosures (6) and (7),...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04739-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 24 February 2005, and by implication, his rebuttal statement dated 2 March 2005, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Boyd and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12164-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to.as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure {1}, with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 31 May 2005 (copy at Tab A) and modifying his Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) data by deleting the weight control entries for 8 February 1997 to 22 March 2000 and 1 March to 25 July 2005 (copy at Tab B).. The Board substantially concurs...