Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10538-07
Original file (10538-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NA\/Y ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5100



 JSR
 Docket No. 10538-07
17 January 2008

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-me mb er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 19 November 2007, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. The Board did not find the supporting statements you provided persuasive, since they reflected no basis to conclude the reporting officials were unaware of the difficult circumstances you inherited. The Board particularly noted that the statement from the reviewing officer, at enclosure 2 to your application, did not recommend removing the contested fitness report. In view of the above, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request .











It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
        



Sincerely,




                                                                        W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                                        Executive Director







Enclosure



















DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
                                             3280 RUSSELL ROAD
 QUANTICO, VA 221 34-5103       


N REPLY REFER TO:
 1610
                                                                                  M MER/PERB
                                                                                 NOV 19 2007     

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:    MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB)
 ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF

(a) DD Form 149 of 5 Sep 07
 (b)      MCO Pl6lO.7E W/’Ch 1-~8
1.       Per MCO 1610.llc, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with Three members present, met on 14 November 2007 to consider
 contained in reference (a) Removal of the fitness report for the period 20030701 to 20031117 (CD) was requested. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive governing submission of the report.

2.       The petitioner requests that the report be removed because the report is unjust and does not accurately reflect his contribution and overall individual character during the reporting period.
3.       In its proceedings, the PERB concluded that the report is administratively correct and procedurally complete as written and filed. The following is offered as relevant:
a.       Per paragraph 5001 of reference (b), reporting officials are required to document and report unsatisfactory performance, lack of potential or unacceptable professional character. The Board found that the report was rendered adverse because of the petitioner’s poor performance and leadership as a Recruiting Sub-Station Staff Noncommissioned Officer In Charge. The Board found that the petitioner was provided the opportunity to rebut the adverse material and offered no factual disagreement. Finally, the Board found that the petitioner fails to provide any substantive evidence to warrant removal of the report.
b.       The Board concluded that the report is an accurate and honest assessment of the petitioner’s overall performance.


Subj:    MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADIVOSRY OPINION BCNR APPICATION THE CASE OF
4. The Board’s opinion, based on deliberation and secret ballot vote, is the fitness report should remain a part of o fficial military record.
5. The case is forwarded for final action.


Chairperson, Performance
 Evaluation Review Board
 Personnel Management Division
 Manpower and Reserve Affairs
Department
By direction of the Commandant
 of the Marine Corps
 2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03854-07

    Original file (03854-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 24 April 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found~ that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09462-07

    Original file (09462-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYHEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS3280 RUSSELL ROADQUANTICO, VA 221 34-51 03 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER/PERB 5 OCT 2007MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDSSubj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06198-07

    Original file (06198-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board felt the contested fitness report made it clear that your medical condition was the reason for your substandard performance. Finally, when given the opportunity to address the adversity contained in the report, the petitioner blamed his medical condition for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03263-07

    Original file (03263-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. In its proceedings, the PERB concluded that the report is administratively correct and procedurally complete as written and filed. The Board found that the petitioner does not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the scale used to weigh him was damaged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02619-07

    Original file (02619-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Most importantly, the Board found that the reviewing officer failed to provide the petitioner an opportunity to submit a rebuttal to his comments. Finally, the Board found that the reviewing officer failed to have the report reviewed by a Third Officer Sighter for appropriate action. Because of the aforementioned discrepancies, the Board found that the report is procedurally incorrect and directed that section “K” be expunged in its entirety; this makes the report procedurally...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03862-07

    Original file (03862-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 24 April 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Finally, the Board found that the NJP, fitness report and revocation of your selection for promotion were separate actions, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05435-07

    Original file (05435-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that the adversity of the report centers around more than administrative failures. The Board also found that the petitioner rebutted the reporting senior’s evaluation, acknowledged the reviewing officer’s adjudication, and chose not to offer any further rebuttal on his own...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08923-07

    Original file (08923-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 21 September 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Finally, the Board found no requirement that derogatory material, beyond the contested fitness report, be forwarded for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03237-07

    Original file (03237-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 5 April 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. VIRGINIA 22134-5103IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610MMER/ PERBAPR 0 5 2007MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05791-07

    Original file (05791-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 19 June 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Regarding the fitness report covering the period 20050401 to 20050629 (TR), the Board found that the petitioner does not provide...