DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SIN
Docket No: 09207-07
6 November 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, gitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 November 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
21 August 2006 at age 19. Subsequently, your accession
urinalysis tested positive for marijuana. On 28 August 2006,
your commanding officer directed your separation. On 30 August
2006 you were discharged with an entry level separation by reason
of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. At that time, you
were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are
separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of
drugs. The Board thus concluded that there 1s no error or
injustice in your reenlistment code. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ladon
W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03581-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJNDocket No: 0358l-0722 January 2008This is in reference to your application for correctionof your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code Section 1552.A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Naval Records sitting in execute session, considered your application on 16 January 2008, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04456-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant changing the reason for your discharge or the reenlistment code due to your urinalysis that tested positive for drugs after you reported to recruit training. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02243-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Given your diagnoses that resulted in discharge after about three months of active service and since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the entry level separation or assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08528-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2008. Documentary material considered: by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09936-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2007. On 18 July 2006 the NPC advised your command that ASN had approved the recommendation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11009-07
A three-member panel Records, sitting in application on 20 Au injustice were revie regulations and proc this Board. On 31 October 2007, yY on the information cxf appears that your acc illegal substance and to your application fox] DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 11009-07 21 August 2008 correction of your to the provisions of tltle 10 of the kection 1552. of the Board for Correction of Naval xecutive...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06509-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 April 2002 at age 25. On 25 April 2002 your commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00651-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08153-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, the Board concluded that your diagnosed chronic Dyshydrotic eczema was sufficient to support the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09727-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...