Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08762-07
Original file (08762-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                      JRE
                                                                                          Docket No. 08762-07
                                                                                         
22 May 2008


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-me mb er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.

The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 19 April 1944 to 9 June 1946. It could not find any indication in the available records that you sustained a hearing loss during that period. Your belief that your present hearing loss was incurred while you were on active duty in the Marine Corps service was carefully considered, but found insufficient to warrant any corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,


        
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04326-08

    Original file (04326-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07650-07

    Original file (07650-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2008. You are requesting that your record be corrected to show that you were on active duty during the period at issue. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01130-08

    Original file (01130-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 5 October 1976, the separation authority approved this request and directed an OTH discharge with a RE-4 reenlistment code, and on 13 October 1976, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01645-07

    Original file (01645-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures appli Board. Your request for discharge was approved, and you were separated from the Marine Corps with a discharge under other than honorable conditions on 28 March 1985, The Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09116-08

    Original file (09116-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The RO states that although there are inconsistencies between the RS’ comments and the petitioner's rebuttal, “what...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09602-07

    Original file (09602-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your case was forwarded, and on 20 July 1967 the discharge authority approved the recommendation for an undesirable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08948-08

    Original file (08948-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 June 2009. Your service record has been reviewed and it has been determined that your reenlistment code of RE-3C was correctly assigned. This may be done by submitting the enclosed Application for Correction of Military Record (DD Form 149) to the Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC 20370-5100.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04375-03

    Original file (04375-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 May 2003, a copy of which is attached. Finally, the Board found no requirement for a Marine Corps Order to be cited in connection with every statement reflecting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02400-07

    Original file (02400-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    02400-07 3 April 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06164-07

    Original file (06164-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 28 February 1976 at age 17. You had one day of time lost for the...