Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07821-07
Original file (07821-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

SUN
Docket No: 07821-07
3 July 2008

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United

States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your

your application, together with all Material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,

and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient

to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 9 January 1978 at age 21. on
6 March and 18 July 1978, you received nonjudicial punishment
(NJP) for disobedience and being out of uniform. On 30 January
1979, you were convicted by special court-martial (SPCM) of three
specifications of unauthorized absence (UA) totaling 114 days.
You were sentenced to a reduction in paygrade, confinement at
hard labor, and a forfeiture of pay. On 16 January 1980, you
were convicted by a second SPCM of two specifications of UA
totaling 186 days and assault with a deadly weapon. You were
sentenced to. confinement at hard labor, a forfeiture of pay, and
a bad conduct discharge (BCD). On 20 March 1980, you waived your
right to request restoration to full duty and received the BCD

after appellate review was completed.

The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
overall period of service. Nevertheless, the Board found that
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge given your two NJP’s, convictions by two SPCM’s
for periods of UA totalin
weapon. Accordingly,
names and votes of the
upon request.

g 10 months, and assault with a deadly
your application has been denied. The

members of the panel will be furnished

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.

Board reconsider its decision upon

evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
‘In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a

presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03716-07

    Original file (03716-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, desire to upgrade your discharge, and the passage of time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05796-10

    Original file (05796-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2011. On 14 June 1979, you received NUP for being disrespectful toward you a chief petty officer on two occasions, and failure to obey a written regulation. On 17 February 1983, after appellate review, you received the BCD.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04588-07

    Original file (04588-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 18 March 1976 at age 18. After the BCD was approved at all levels of review, on 25 November 1980 you were so discharged.The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03358-11

    Original file (03358-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 November 1973 you began another period of UA totalling that was not terminated until 10 March 1977. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01562-10

    Original file (01562-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 9 July 1976 you submitted a written request for immediate execution of the BCD.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03368-06

    Original file (03368-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09236-07

    Original file (09236-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and assertions that your misconduct and discharge were the result of you being under the influence of alcohol, and that you were not offered treatment for your alcohol abuse. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00931-02

    Original file (00931-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 26 March 1981 you were convicted by SPCM of two incidents of larceny in the amount of $310, government vehicle, and communicating a threat. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02884-02

    Original file (02884-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. duty for 14 days. However, this request was denied and on 9 May 1979, after the BCD was approved at all levels of review, you were so discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00573-07

    Original file (00573-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...