Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07781-07
Original file (07781-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOAR FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TIR
Docket No: 7781-07

20 August 2008

  

This is in reference tp your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United

States Code, Section 1652.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 19 August 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary matterial considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval redord, and applicable statutes, regulations,

and policies.

record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

After careful and found the evs consideration of the entire

You enlisted in the Navy 25 April 1989 at age 19. You served
without disciplinary intident until 31 July 1989, when you
received nonjudicial puhishment (NUP) for failure to go to your
appointed place of duty|and three specifications of failure to
obey a lawful order. “fepo three months later, on 20 October

s

 

_ 1989, an investigative report stated that you had been
apprehended for possession and alleged use of marijuana.

On 7 November 1989 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by redson of misconduct due to drug abuse and
commission of a serious loffense. After consulting with legal
counsel you elected to present your case to an administrative
discharge board (ADB). |On 30 November 1989 you received NJP for
two specifications of wrongful possession and use of marijuana.
The punishment imposed was restriction and extra duty for 45 days

and a $698 forfeiture of] pay.
On 1 December 1989 an

ADB recommended separation under other than

honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of

a serious offense.

concurrence with the ADB,

than honorable conditilo
commission of a serious

Subsequently, your commanding officer,

in
also recommended separation under other
ns by reason of misconduct due to

offense. On 25 January 1990 the

discharge authority approved these recommendations and directed

an other than honorabl
were so separated.

The Board, in its revi
carefully weighed all
your youth, post servi
also considered your al
would financially assi
these factors were not
of your discharge beca
drug related misconduc
denied.

i?
ic

iS
IS

ju

The names and votes of
upon request.

It is regretted that t
favorable action canno
Board reconsider its de
evidence or other matt
In this regard, it is
presumption of regular
Consequently, when app
record, the burden is 6
existence of probable m

 

e discharge,

Ic.

and on 31 January 1990, you

ew of your entire record and application,

otentially mitigating factors, such as

e conduct, and the passage of time. It
sertion that an upgrade of your discharge
t you. Nevertheless, the Board concluded
sufficient to warrant recharacterization
se of the seriousness of your repetitive
Accordingly, your application has been

the members of the panel will be furnished

e circumstances of your case are such that
be taken. You are entitled to have the
cision upon submission of new and material
r not previously considered by the Board.

Mportant to keep in mind that a

ty attaches to all official records.

ying for a correction of an official naval
n the applicant to demonstrate the

aterial error or injustice.

Sincerely,

\p

W. DEAN

Executive or

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06050-09

    Original file (06050-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01567-10

    Original file (01567-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04203-07

    Original file (04203-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 18 July 1989, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 23 after a prior period of honorable service. On...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00118-08

    Original file (00118-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 6 March 1989, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03554-07

    Original file (03554-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 23 June 1989, the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09335-07

    Original file (09335-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 10 June 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 24. However, no separation action was taken and you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06500-08

    Original file (06500-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 24 August 1989, you received your third NUP for wrongful use of cocaine.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09919-07

    Original file (09919-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boar your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes and policies. On 30 May 1990 discharge authority directed an other than honorabl reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious 31 May 1990 you were so discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05384-06

    Original file (05384-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 January 1989 at age 18. On 12 March 1991 you received NJP for this...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02757-06

    Original file (02757-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board round the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error o in j u t iceYou reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 21 February 1981 after three years of prior honorable service. ...