Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07404-07
Original file (07404-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

RDZ:ecb
Docket No. 07404-07
11 April 2008

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the

United States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 April 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
decision of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 29 November

2006, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, and notwithstanding the advisory opinion, the Board
found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish
the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this
connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the Navy Council of Review Board decision.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon

request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

 
  
 

W. DEAN PFE
Executive Di

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07394-07

    Original file (07394-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTJON OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JREDocket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06887-07

    Original file (06887-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07872-08

    Original file (07872-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Sécretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards 19 December 2008, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06127-07

    Original file (06127-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 26 March 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08357-10

    Original file (08357-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2011. The Board also noted that you are entitled to submit the attached Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States (DD Form 293) to the Naval Council of Personnel Review Boards, Attention: Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), 720 Kennon Street, SE, Room 309, Washington Navy Yard, Washington, DC 20375-5023,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04855-07

    Original file (04855-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, the Board concurred with the finding of the Combat Related Special Compensation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09078-07

    Original file (09078-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 30 September 2008, a copy of which is : attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01548-07

    Original file (01548-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    01548-07 12 February 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Navy Bureau of Medicine dated 24 June 2007 and the Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06206-07

    Original file (06206-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch , Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (CORE), dated 29 December 2006, that your condition is not related to exposure to Agent Orange, or otherwise combat-related.After careful...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09705-07

    Original file (09705-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, ions and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ansufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the...