NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04664-10
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 February 2011. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were fit for duty on 31 March 1998 and therefore discharged in error, the Board concluded that there was no basis for correcting your record to show that you received a more favorable reentry code than RE-3P. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05542-97
waiver for enlistment in July 1989 but also had five or more At this time you were recurrent episodes since that time. The medical report noted, in Your record On 14 June 1990 a medical board diagnosed you with recurrent herpes The board noted that a simples keratitis of the right eye. you were so separated and assigned an On 3 July 1990 RR-3P reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05199-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2011-009
On July 14, 2003, the applicant was separated from the Coast Guard because of a physical disability. The Board notes the applicant’s argument that if his application is untimely, the Board should consider that the physical evaluation boards acted untimely in resolving his physical disability issue because his back problem was diagnosed in 1999 and he was not discharged until 2003. The applicant’s then-CO noted that the applicant had been in a limited duty status for over 30 months and that...
CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-009
On July 14, 2003, the applicant was separated from the Coast Guard because of a physical disability. The Board notes the applicant’s argument that if his application is untimely, the Board should consider that the physical evaluation boards acted untimely in resolving his physical disability issue because his back problem was diagnosed in 1999 and he was not discharged until 2003. The applicant’s then-CO noted that the applicant had been in a limited duty status for over 30 months and that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04271-07
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You were released from four years of active duty in the Marine Corps on 25 January 2002. At that time, you were assigned an RE—3P...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06578-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 1998-025
She argued that it was wrong for her to have been assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code when she had a medical condition that could heal. CGPC stated that “[t]he applicant was discharged in xxxxx 199x by reason of physical disability with a 20% rating and received severance pay.” CGPC stated that the applicant was assigned the separation code JFL, which means “involuntary discharge … resulting form physical disability with entitle- ment to severance pay,” and that members with that code are...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2001-027
On January 29, 1999, the Commandant of the Coast Guard took final action and approved the applicant’s discharge due to disability with a 20% disability rating for “lumbosacral strain; unilateral, in standing position.” Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision On December 8, 1999, after the applicant’s discharge from the Coast Guard, the DVA granted the applicant a 20% disability rating for “low back pain [and] degenerative disc disease [of the] lumbar spine.” (Some of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1668 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 February 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. A review of your medical prescreening documents revealed no record of you reporting the ankle injury or the history of suicidal thoughts...