Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05830-07
Original file (05830-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 SJN
 Docket No: 05830-07
27 March 2008


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. -
A three- memb er panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2008. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 23 January 1986 at age 18. During the period from 8 April to 22 July 1988 you received three nonjudicial punishments (NJP’s) for making false officials statements, disobedience, unauthorized absence, three instances of dereliction of duty, and two specifications of breaking restriction. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in-administrative separation after your first NJP.
On 31 August 1988, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. You waived your right to consult with counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB).
On 7 September 1988, your commanding officer forwarded his recommendation that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct. On 12 September 1988 the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. On
                   3 November 1988 you were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall record of service, post service accomplishments and contention that you were following orders. However, the Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three NJP’s, two of which were imposed after you were counseled and warned of the consequences of further misconduct. Further, you waived the right to an ADB, your best chance for retention or a better characterization of service. Concerning your contention, there is no evidence in the record to support it, and you submitted no such evidence. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches-to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,



W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01737-80

    Original file (01737-80.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. In connection with this processing, you acknowledged that separation could result in an OTH discharge and waived the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your misconduct that continued...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08852-07

    Original file (08852-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warning that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05232-07

    Original file (05232-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 4 April 1988 at age 22. You waived your right to consult with counsel,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03967-08

    Original file (03967-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2008. You waived your right to consult with counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07221-07

    Original file (07221-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 4 May 1988, you enlisted in the Navy at age 23.On 23 August 1988, you had nonjudicial punishment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05741-07

    Original file (05741-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2008. On 15 January 1990, you began a UA that ended on 3 February 1990, a period of about 19 days. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your misconduct that continued even after you were counseled regarding deficiencies in your performance and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00731-09

    Original file (00731-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 June 1988, you received NUP for wrongful use of marijuana and UA. Additionally, after your third NUP, you were counseled and warned that further | misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.. On 27 June 1988, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10611-06

    Original file (10611-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes., regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entirerecord, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 22 May 1987 you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. In connection with this processing, you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06616-07

    Original file (06616-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You waived your right to consult with counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10981-07

    Original file (10981-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel} of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support|thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Bdard concluded that these factors and explanation were not) sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due...