Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05683-07
Original file (05683-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100,

 

TIR
Docket No: 5683-07
17 April 2008

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United

States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 April 2008. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,

and policies.

to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 12 June 1996 at age 18 and served
without disciplinary incident until 7 November 1996, when you
received nonjudicial punishment (NUP) for absence from your
appointed place of duty and a three day period of unauthorized
absence (UA). The punishment imposed was a $204 forfeiture of
pay and restriction and extra duty for seven days.

On 3 December 1996 you were referred for a psychiatric evaluation
after stating that you had slit your wrist and did not care about
living. The psychiatrist’s report stated, in part, that due to
your extremely primitive character and history of substance and
alcohol abuse, as well as your chronic suicidal ideations and
recent suicidal attempt, you were considered to be at
considerable ongoing risk of further acts of self-harm. The
report further stated that you had a bad temper, were punching
walls, engaging in risky behavior, stealing, and fighting. You
were diagnosed with alcohol dependence with physiologic
dependence, severe personality disorder with borderline,
antisocial and narcissistic features (that existed prior to
enlistment), and self-inflicted lacerations of the left wrist.
=< Gtreeted a generat discharge by reason-of -conventence of the ===

Subsequently, you were recommended for an administrative
separation because your long-standing personality disorder which
was of such severity as to interfere with serving in the

military.

On 16 December 1996 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of convenience of the government as a
result of the foregoing diagnosis. The discharge authority

government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. On 16
January 1997 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4

reenlistment code.

The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and assertion that you do not now have a personality
disorder. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were
not sufficient to warrant a change in the reenlistment code
because of your diagnosed personality disorder. Further, an RE-4
reenlistment code is authorized when a Sailor is separated for
this reason and is not recommended for retention or reenlistment.
Finally, the is documented evidence in the record which is
contrary to your assertion. Accordingly, your application has

been denied.

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

We po. PFE
Executive D xr

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02428-06

    Original file (02428-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1997 at age 20. You were also recommended for Level III alcohol...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08665-00

    Original file (08665-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNE NA’JAL RECORD X S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 8665-00 11 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicatilon for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations and procedures applicable to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07023-01

    Original file (07023-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged because of a diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700613

    Original file (ND0700613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was diagnosed with "Personality Disorder with borderline features" by competent medical authority at the Mental Health Clinic, Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, VA, and was recommended for expeditious administrative separation from the Navy. 19920428 Medical Record: Reason for visit. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02786-07

    Original file (02786-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 June 2002 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 2 March...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05629-07

    Original file (05629-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 October 1995 at age 17 and served without disciplinary incident.On 4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04657-11

    Original file (04657-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04328-06

    Original file (04328-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07489-08

    Original file (07489-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The discharge authority directed an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government due to a diagnosed personality disorder and on 17 November 1997 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. It also considered your explanation for providing false...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00562-05

    Original file (00562-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 December 2004 the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to alcohol abuse. On 22 December 2004 you were so separated from the Navy, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.