NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00264-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider your Agent Orange-related disabilities because there is no evidence in the available records that those conditions have been rated by the Department of Veterans Affairs, or that CRSC Branch has denied your request for CRSC for such conditions. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06206-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch , Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (CORE), dated 29 December 2006, that your condition is not related to exposure to Agent Orange, or otherwise combat-related.After careful...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00314-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that the entry in your evaluation report for the 17 January-5 November 1968 period concerning “trouble” with your back” refers to recurrent infections of a pilonidal cyst which required extensive treatment, rather than to a traumatic back injury. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02264-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2007. Your case for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) is not supported by the relevant documentary information provided.2. Reconsideration by the CRSC Branch is appropriate under any of the following circumstances:(1) You believe this decision is incorrect due to an administrative error or incorrect/incomplete information.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02756-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board was not persuaded that your cardiovascular disease was the direct result of a combat...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10798-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following documents are recommended: Original VA Rating Decision discussing why the VA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05029-07
Your request should be based upon information that was not already contained in your original application package and should includeSubj: DENIAL OF CRSC IN THE CASE DOCKET NUMBER MCO6-02904supporting documentation, as appropriate. Reconsideration by the CRSC Branch is appropriate under any of the following circumstances:(1) You believe this decision is incorrect due to an administrative error or incorrect/incomplete information. to review CRSC decisions.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02675-05
Sincerely, Enclosure DEPARTI~NT OF THE NAVY SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS COMBAT-RELATED SPECIAL COMPENSATION BRANCH 201 12TH STREET SUITE 703 ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4357 iN REPLY REFER 10 1850/I CRSC 15 Mar 2005 Subj: APPROVAL OF CRSC UPON RECONSIDERATION IN THE CASE OF~E~ qflUIIgIpUUIqqU~MUJP~4~ USN DOCKET NUMBER NCO4—00680 Ref: (a) 10 U.S. Code 1413a End: (1) DD Form 149 Application for Correction of Military Record 1. Your application package does not establish that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06637-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2007. In addition, the Board considered the letter from the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Branch, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards (SECNAVCORB), dated 25 June 2006, which advised you of the basis for the administrative denial of your request for CRSC. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00466-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2009. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Board dated 13 November 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.