Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03923-07
Original file (03923-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 3923-07

6 August 2008

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 
     

Subj: FORMER @
REVIEW OF

NAVAL RECORD

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552
(b) SECNAVINST 1910.4B

Encl: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Petitioner’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by
changing the reason for discharge and the reentry code he was

assigned on 14 January 2002.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms. mp yr. Pend Mr. ie

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 _
July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the

corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by

the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as

follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and

regulations within the Department of the Navy. Petitioner
enlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 March 2001. on 22 August 2001

a psychiatric evaluation diagnosed Petitioner with an adjustment
disorder with a depressed mood. On 14 January 2002 he received a
general discharge by reason of personality disorder and was

assigned a reentry code of RE-4B.

b. An advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps,
dated 1 May 2008, Opined that the reason for discharge was
correct. A second advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine
Corps, dated 8 May 2008, advised that Petitioner’s RE-4B reentry

code had been changed to RE-4.

c. Reference (b) states that a personality disorder, as
defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), must be diagnosed in order to
Support a separation by reason of personality disorder. The Dsm
IV does not list an adjustment disorder as a personality
disorder.

d. Reference (b) also states that an individual may be
separated by reason of best interest of the service if separation
is appropriate but no other reason set forth in the reference
covers the situation at hand. Individuals separated for this
reason may receive a reentry code of RE-R1, RE-1, or RE-4,

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board notes that Petitioner’s record contains no
evidence that he was diagnosed with a personality disorder in
addition to an adjustment disorder. Therefore, the Board
concludes that the reason should be changed to “best interest of
the service”, a non-stigmatizing basis for separation which is
assigned when no other reason is appropriate.

Although Petitioner requested that his reentry code be changed
from RE-4B, the Board notes that an RE-4 reentry code is
authorized by regulatory guidance for those discharged by reason
of best interest of the service. Given Petitioner’s present
adjustment disorder, the Board concurs with the advisory opinion
from HQOMC and concludes that his present reentry code is not

erroneous or unjust.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
received a general discharge by reason of best interest of the
service on 14 January 2002.

b. That no further relief be granted.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN keg R. ICIOS

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07383-06

    Original file (07383-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 27 October 2003. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial relief. Given Petitioner’s adjustment problem and suicide attempt, the Board concludes that her present reentry code is not erroneous or unjust.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07261-01

    Original file (07261-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N OC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TJR Docket No: 7261-01 5 April 2002 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Sub j : REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03928-02

    Original file (03928-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 19 September 1995. e. On 19 September 1995 he received an entry level separation by reason of personality disorder. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants partial relief.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07576-98

    Original file (07576-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 8 April 1998. Accordingly, the Board concludes that the reason should be changed to reason for separation which is assigned when no other reason is appropriate. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show he received an entry level...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06570-09

    Original file (06570-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 6570-09 2 June 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To Secretary of the Navy Subj REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Further, reference (b) does not specifically authorize...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08843-09

    Original file (08843-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former lance corporal of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting the narrative reason (“Personality Disorder”), JFX1 separation code, and RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. His case was forwarded to the separation authority, and on 4 August 2005, he received a general discharge and was assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a “Personality Disorder”. The Board finds an impropriety in his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04647-07

    Original file (04647-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 4647-07 19 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: FORM! Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing his reentry code issued on 22 October 2001. With respect to his reentry code the Board notes that the RE-4 reentry code is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13

    Original file (NR2947 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05189-08

    Original file (05189-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sincerely, LN a © W. DEAN PFEIFF Executive Dire Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 5189-08 7 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj}: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner contends that he was misdiagnosed with a personality and adjustment disorder and that the Marine Corps made poor decisions based on his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR988 14

    Original file (NR988 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    EGA Docket No: 0988-14 23 March 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ry osu, XXX-XX- Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. O'Neill, Ms. McCain, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...