DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No. 03896-07
6 May 2008
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 May 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board affirmed the
findings it made on 2 August 2005, which are as state in the
enclosed letter dated 9 August 2005.
further consideration of your application is a statement from a
psychologist dated 24 February 2007. The psychologist is of the
Opinion that you may have been suffering from posttraumatic
stress disorder in 1969, which “may have explained some of
[your] bizarre behavior at the time.”
sentence to confinement for a period of imprisonment of six to
ten years. It concluded that the new evidence is insufficient to
warrant upgrading your undesirable discharge to general or
honorable, or to change the basis for your discharge.
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Executive D
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07317-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01184-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10257-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 December 2004 at age 19. After review, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11176-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 20 November 2002 at age 20. After review, a clinical psychologist...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08336-07
The offenses you committed which resulted in this sentence are not stated. The Board found that these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your multiple instances of misconduct while in the Navy. There is no evidence in your Navy record and you have submitted none to show that you were mentally ill while in the Navy or if you were that it was sufficient to mitigate your misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10576-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02528-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were discharged for the convenience of the government by reason of a personality disorder on 27 May 2005 and assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06668-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09769-05
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 September 2005 at age 19. Based on your actions while in recruit training, the history you provided, and the psychological testing, you were diagnosed with a narcissistic personality disorder with antisocial traits.Consequently you were processed for an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00187-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...