Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02328-07
Original file (02328-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 2328-07

15 January 2008

 

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

   
 

 

 

 

From:
To: secretary of the Navy
Subj: ORME Reig :

REVIEW OF NAVAL RE
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) Case Summary

 

(2) Subject's naval record

(a}, Petitioner

i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference
applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by
changing the reentry code she was assigned on 19 January 2007.

2. The Board, consisting of Ms my and Messrs. ~~ 206

=gumm reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice

on 15 November 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined

that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and

applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

4

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as

follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. On 24 May 2005 Petitioner enlisted in the Navy Reserve

for eight years under a program which required her to attend
recruit training during her first year of service. She later
requested and was granted an extension of time to attend recruit

training.

c. On 19 January 2007 Petitioner received a general

discharge by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to her
failure to attend recruit training, and she was not recommended

for reenlistment.

d. Petitioner states that after she enlisted in the Navy
Reserve, a recruiter offered her the opportunity to enlist in the
Regular Navy. Since she was convinced that this was going to
happen, she saw no reason to attend Navy Reserve recruit
training. She did not enlist in the Regular Navy because of
paperwork delays and the transfer of her recruiter. By the time
she realized what was happening, the opportunity to attend Navy
Reserve recruit training had expired, and she was discharged for
failing to attend that training.

e. A service member may be discharged for the best interest

of the service if no other appropriate reason for separation
exists. A member discharged for the best interest of the service
may receive an honorable discharge and be recommended for

reenlistment.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner’s record
was free of any disciplinary action. The Board also notes that
Petitioner was convinced that she was going to be enlisted in the
Navy and that it was not necessary for her to attend Navy Reserve
recruit training. Accordingly, the Board concludes that her
record shouid be corrected to show that on 19 January 2007 she
was issued an honorable discharge by reason of best interest of
the service, and that she was recommended for reenlistment.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
on 19 January 2007, she received an honorable discharge by reason
of best interest of the service and that she was recommended for

reenlistment.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Ss kg IOS
Recorder : cting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02956-01

    Original file (02956-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Sleepwalking is such a condition. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by chang- assigned on 8 January 1997, to ing the RE-4 reenlistment code, RE-3E. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04752-07

    Original file (04752-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board, requesting a change in her RE-4 reenlistment code and reason for discharge (“Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards”)- 2. She was discharged with an entry level separation, assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, and a JFW separation code on 9 March 2006.f. That a copy of this report of proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.c.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01904-99

    Original file (01904-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. f. On 15 March 1994, Petitioner was notified than an entry level separation was being considered by reason of convenience of the government due to a severe adjustment disorder. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she was received an uncharacterized entry level separation on 23...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01419-01

    Original file (01419-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case (3) Subject's naval record Summary Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting-that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-2 reenlistment code assigned on 5 January 2001. Therefore, the Board concludes that the Rather than change the reenlistment code as an exception to policy, the Board believes that the best way to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00250-07

    Original file (00250-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, the widow of a former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that her late husband's (Subject's) naval record be corrected to show that he was eligible for reserve retirement and that he elected spousal coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The corrected record will then show that he completed 20 years of qualifying service in March 2006 and was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04334-12

    Original file (04334-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in her RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 12 January 1998. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Storz and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 19 March 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09629-06

    Original file (09629-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that the record be corrected to show that she was advanced to petty officer second class (PN2; E-5), and by changing her reenlistment code.2. The Board believes that her six years of excellent service and the fact that she was unable to pass the PFA only because of her foot problem support her contention that a nonrecommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11143-07

    Original file (11143-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 5G Docket No: 11143-07 7 May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF =ajiiitiiiiiiiiijssihimeysrpesrsasiac,, Ref: ~ (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that she be reinstated in the Navy...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05390-07

    Original file (05390-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that her record be corrected to show that she was released from active duty, vice being discharged 2 May 2002. Marine Corps regulations require the assignment of an RE-3N when a female Marine is separated early because of pregnancy or single parenthood.CONCLUSION:Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record and especially...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01243-08

    Original file (01243-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected, in effect, to show that she was not discharged on 13 December 2009 under other than honorable conditions or reduced in grade to of lance corporal (LCpl; E-3), and that she was recommended for reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. ae ve ie and Mr. ii reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...