Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01897-07
Original file (01897-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC
 Docket No. 1897-07
29 Apr 07
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
 To:      Secretary of the Navy
         Subj:

 Ref:   (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

         End:     (1)      DD Form 149 w/attach m ents
                  (2)      NPC memo 1430 Ser 4811E9/ 182 of 02 Apr 07
                  (3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.
2.       The Board, consisting of Chapman, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUS ION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following c orrective action.










Docket No. 1897-07
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

 a.       Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 December 2005.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.



 ROBERT D. ZSAL MAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder         Acting Recorder

 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.




 29 April 2007


                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER
                                                               Executive Director














2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01238-07

    Original file (01238-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Chapman, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01897-01

    Original file (01897-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00561-07

    Original file (00561-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02250-07

    Original file (02250-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Hurnberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02866-07

    Original file (02866-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02241-07

    Original file (02241-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100LCCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00981-07

    Original file (00981-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject,. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02536-07

    Original file (02536-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show orders were issued prior to 7 August 2006 50 he will be entitled to reimbursement for making a Do-It-Yourself (DITY) move.2. The Board, consisting of Chapman, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10340-06

    Original file (10340-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09414-07

    Original file (09414-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Member was scheduled to be advanced on active duty, effective 16 January 2007. In addition, the member must affiliate with a Navy Reserve unit within twelve months from their release from active duty date and must submit an advancement determination request within six months of affiliation, (enclosure (2)d. Petitioner submitted the required documents within the mandatory six month timeline for advancement to E-5 to his Naval Reserve unit in a timely manner. If the documents are not...