DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG
Docket No: 1590-07
28 January 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 January 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 13 March 1987 at age 20. At
that time you agreed to serve on active duty for three years and
as a drilling reservist for three years. Your record shows that
you served on active duty from 24 March 1987 to 23 March 1990.
At that time, you were released from active duty with your
service characterized as honorable with an RE-1 reenlistment
code. A Statement of Service for Naval Reserve Retirement was
obtained and shows that you never completed your three year
drilling obligation. The record shows that you were honorably
discharged on 30 May 1991 and were not recommended for
reenlistment. The discharge package is not filed in the record
but the Board assumed that you were discharged because of
unsatisfactory participation. Regulations require that an
individual not be recommended for reenlistment when they are
discharged because of unsatisfactory participation.
Since it is clear that you did not complete your drilling
obligation as required by the program in which you enlisted, the
Board concluded that the record should not be corrected to show
that you were recommended for reenlistment on 30 May 1991.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00
You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04736-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07481-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06815-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 7 November 1986. After review by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06872-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 28 February 2008 you were sent a notification of separation processing due to unsatisfactory participation by registered mail. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11146-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08043-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 dune 2009. This action certainly suggests that there was a basis for the separation processing. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01038-01
in-charge (OINC) recommended to the discharge authority that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation. of your scheduled active duty for training and had sufficient time to make arrangements for child care, but you did not make the unit aware of problems until after your missed a drill and the period of active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2006-158
This final decision, dated March 30, 2007, is signed by the three duly appointed members APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record by upgrading his general discharge from the Coast Guard Reserve for misconduct (shirking) on July 9, 1991, to an honorable discharge. Records show that your last participation in the Coast Guard Reserve was August 1988. On March 1, 1991, the District Commander sent the applicant a letter stating that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10884-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Per Navy regulations, and once you receive your discharge this ID card is required to be returned to your command.