NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800014
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2947 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. In the alternative, that his general characterization of service be upgraded to honorable, RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code be changed to RE-1, and receive full involuntary separation pay. Although Petitioner was medically diagnosed with an adjustment disorder, the DD Form 214 erroneously states that he was discharged by reason of a “PERSONALITY DISORDER”.
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01329
ND02-01329 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020917, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Physically qualified. I have been in much better physical condition. 010808: Commanding Officer, Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base, Willow Grove, PA, approved Applicant’s discharge and directed his discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10966-07
The Board, consisting of Ms. "\ijiililimg, and Messrs. WNR@lie and a: reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 August 2008 and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that he was assigned an reentry code of RE- 3E on 16 December 2005. b. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10460-07
You then served in the Navy Reserve until 14 September 1991, when you were honorably discharged from the service and not recommended for reenlistment pursuant to the approved findings of an administrative discharge board (ADB). You completed reports of medical history on those dates in which you falsely denied that you had ever been discharged from military service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06071-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval: records be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 20 May 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 20 May 2008, she was separated from the Navy with an entry level separation by reason of her...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501476
PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20010911 by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant was discharged on 20010911 with a DD Form 214 that listed the separation authority as MILPERSMAN 1910-102 and the narrative reason for separation as personality disorder. On 20010926, the...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800719
Based on the aforementioned evidence, the NDRB determined there was an inequity in the characterization of discharge and an upgrade to “Honorable” would be appropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11135-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY : BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 11135-08 7 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Si aa REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06318-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of reenlistment code and change of reason for separation authority. Therefore, the Board believes that the less stigmatizing reenlistment code of RE-3H is warranted, and the separation authority should be reference (c) and not reference (b). That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to...