Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01167-07
Original file (01167-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
 Docket No. 1167-07
27 Feb 07
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
End:     (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
 (2)      Telecon Representative, Exam Ctr, & Ms. Crone, BCNR
(3)      Subject’s naval record
1.       Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.
2.       The Board, consisting of Bourgeois, Boyd, and Mann, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUS ION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record , and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.









Docket No. 1167-07
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-5 effective 16 July 2006.
b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.


ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS,
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



27 February 2007


















2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01209-07

    Original file (01209-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.3. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01220-07

    Original file (01220-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.3. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02861-07

    Original file (02861-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlejn, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05360-07

    Original file (05360-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00912-07

    Original file (00912-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Humberd, and Mr. Dietrich, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10340-06

    Original file (10340-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01114-07

    Original file (01114-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of George, Koman, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00915-07

    Original file (00915-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Humberd, and Mr. Dietrich, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00916-07

    Original file (00916-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Humberd, and Mr. Dietrich, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00913-07

    Original file (00913-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Humberd, and Mr. Dietrich, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...