NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03267-06
The Board noted that, although he was eligible, your deceased husband had never enrolled in the Reserve component Survivor Benefit Plan after becoming eligible for retirement (without pay). They found that he had received ample opportunity to request retired pay and enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan during the almost 14 years between 8 April 1991 to 18 January 2005. was eligible for retired pay on 8 April 1991.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09987-06
And they found no substantiation for your claim that the signature was “forged.” The Board also noted that your divorce decree from 1996 does not contain any requirement that your former husband provide “former spouse” SBP coverage and no “former spouse” premiums were paid. Reference (a) states in part that a married member is enrolled with spouse coverage based on full-retired pay at the time of retirement unless that spouse has concurred in writing to another election requested by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09433-08
BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 June 2009. The Board found that you also certified on the DD 2656 that you were aware that your husband’s retired pay would stop when he dies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07253-10
Under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any change to your husband’s RCSBP election. Under this option, if the retiree dies before reaching age 60, a survivor annuity is payable on the date the member would have attained age 60. Option C - Immediate annuity.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09927-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08353-10
You learned that he was not participating in the SBP in, approximately, 1991. Prior to his retirement, he declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) by filing a NAVCOMPT 2272. There is no evidence that Qs sought to enroll in SBP during the open seasons.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04012-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07590-01
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. In response to reference (a), record to reflect that he enrolled in the Survivor lan (SBP) prior to transferring to the Fleet Reserve on recommend BCNR not correct PO1 5 November 1974. Public Law 92-425, which enacted SBP on 21 September 1972, provided that a retiree's participation in SBP at the maximum level was automatic unless...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00057-02
opinion furnished by ’s naval record In addition, the Board considered the advisory 25 March 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error upon submission of new and material In this regard, it is important iIl.justice. throughout the Navy between 1972 and 1979 called for a member's spouse to be notified of a member's declination by a letter.