Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00807-07
Original file (00807-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                                    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC
Docket No. 807-07
19 Apr 07









This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC letter, 1000 PERS312D1/07, 28 March 2007, a copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,




         W.       DEAN PFEIFFER
         Executive Director




Enclosure



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000


1000
PERS-3l2Dl/07
28 Mar 07



From:    Commander, Navy Personnel Command
To:      Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Via:     Assistant, Board for Correction of Naval Records (Pers-31C)

Subj:    ADVISORY OPINION ICO

Ref:     (a) BCNR Docket Number 00807-07


1.       It is our opinion that reference (a) be disapproved. The member’s service record does not support the fact that the was the home of record at the time he reported for active duty on 12 December 2001. His record shows Los Angeles, CA as the home of record, and that he established residence in the United States in Los Angeles, Ca on 24 September 1995.






By direction

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07045-02

    Original file (07045-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04946-07

    Original file (04946-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    4946—07 28 Aug 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05353-03

    Original file (05353-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8278 13

    Original file (NR8278 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reimbursement of commercial airfare ticket. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations anc policies.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08613-07

    Original file (08613-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1000 PERS312D1/06 of 15 Nov 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8283 13

    Original file (NR8283 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    27 July 2013. see enclosure (3). The advisory opinion points out the following evidence to support its position: in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Petitioner was paid correctly on her travel claim when she was not reimbursed for her non-U.S.. certified air carrier ticket. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8282 13

    Original file (NR8282 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reimbursement of commercial airfare EVCKSE . Even though Petitioner was told to purchase the ticket by his command, there was 4 U.S. certified air carrier ticket available for the first leg of travel. When Petitioner received TDY/TAD orders to Luzon Province, Republic of the Philippines,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01426-02

    Original file (01426-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request to draw Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for Los Angeles, CA (dependent location) vice New Orleans, LA (new duty station).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06849-06

    Original file (06849-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6849-06 25 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8279 13

    Original file (NR8279 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory opinion points out the following evidence to support its position: in accordance with the Joint Federal Travel Regulations (JFTR), Petitioner was paid correctly on his travel claim when he was not reimbursed for his non-U.S. certified air carrier ticket. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and notwithstanding the opinion expressed in enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting corrective action. When Petitioner...