Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00418-07
Original file (00418-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510@RS

Docket No: 418-07
28 March 2007

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

 

 

 

 

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06596-01

    Original file (06596-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that he be reinstated in the Naval Reserve. His overall record while he In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 20 June 2001 but transferred to the IRR and recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06138-99

    Original file (06138-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    the Board believes that if Given the circumstances, had understood his situation he would have qualified Therefore, the Board concludes that the record It is clear that Petitioner The best way to accomplish this action is to correct the two year 3 enlistment in the Regular Navy of 23 December 1975 to show that The record should it was an enlistment in the Naval Reserve. With these corrections, years of qualifying service in the reserve component, will have 20 qualifying years for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12209-08

    Original file (12209-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by being reinstated in the Navy Reserve rather than discharged on 7 April 2005. ot 2. Normally, a reservist who has shown consistently good performance would be transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and recommended for reaffiliation. It believes that the general discharge was too harsh and the more favorable action of transferring him to the IRR and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01904-03

    Original file (01904-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 January 2001. The Board, consisting of Ms.-Ms.-dand Mr. -, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02493-05

    Original file (02493-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 October 2001 to 30 May 2002 and 1 November 2002 to 5 June 2003, copies of which are at Tabs A and B, respectively. Finally, she requested removal of any reference to her involuntary transfer to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), her not being recommended for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09629-06

    Original file (09629-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that the record be corrected to show that she was advanced to petty officer second class (PN2; E-5), and by changing her reenlistment code.2. The Board believes that her six years of excellent service and the fact that she was unable to pass the PFA only because of her foot problem support her contention that a nonrecommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08220-07

    Original file (08220-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 8220-07 5. May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ‘fil Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2082 14

    Original file (NR2082 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRFC memo 5420 Ser N1/1169 of 20 Nov 14, a copy of which is attached. Under the governing regulations, to be eligible to transfer benefits, a member must be on active duty or in the selective reserve at the time of the election to transfer. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02179-05

    Original file (02179-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by promoting him to major in the Marine Corps Reserve with a date of rank and effective date to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Reserve Major Selection Board, which is 1 July 2004. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Boyd and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08322-01

    Original file (08322-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Bpard requesting that her record be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 1 October 2000 but continued to serve in the She is also requesting credit for paid-drills from February 2001. It CONCLUSION: The fact that the doctor found her physically The Board believes that...