DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 11271-06
4 February 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 January 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 26 May
1993. On 7 October 1993 you received nonjudicial punishment
(NUP) for indecent assault. On 4 February 1996 you received a
second NJP for an unauthorized absence on 13 January 1996. The
punishment imposed consisted of a forfeiture of one-half months
pay per month for two months and reduction in rank, both of which
were suspended.
The Board rejected your uncorroborated assertion that you were
not absent on 13 January 1996. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will
be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
\p
4
W. DEAN P
Executive Di!
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02900-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 9 December 1996, the Naval Discharge Review Board denied your request for changes in the characterization of service and the reason for discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04160-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 12 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the , existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02293-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 16 June 1992. On 13 December 1993 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Sep 21 09_48_01 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were ordered The following day you signed a statement that The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 10 December 1993 for eight years at age 23. active duty as an AN (E-3) for a period of 36 months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06924-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00169-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Na-1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 1999. The Board concluded that the foregoing factor and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterizaton of your discharge given your record of two NJPs and a conviction by a special court-martial in only 14 months of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3996 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted:in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07185-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. counseling or warning entry in the record and a single nonjudicial punishment for a 15 minute unauthorized absence did not support discharge due to a pattern of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00122-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2011. Unfortunately you were administratively separated with an other than honorable discharge (OTH) due to repeated acts of misconduct in June of 1996. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06094-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In connection with this processing you acknowledged that separation could result in an other than honorable (OTH) discharge and elected the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...