Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08934-06
Original file (08934-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RFCORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 2Q37O~5 100




 SMW
 Docket No: 8934-06
16 February 2007






This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
On 27 June 1988 you enlisted in the Navy at age 18 after disclosing pre-service use of marijuana. On 2 July 1988 you acknowledged the Navy’s drug abuse policy. On 1 February 1989 your urinalysis tested positive for marijuana, and on 9 March 1989 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for this offense. On 16 March 1989, another urinalysis tested positive for marijuana.
Although the record is incomplete, it appears that your commanding officer (CO) subsequently initiated administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and recommended an other than honorable discharge. In connection with this processing, you apparently waived the right to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 23 March 1989 the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. On 5 April 1989 you were so discharged.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth. The Board also considered your contention of good post service conduct. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your drug related offense and ensuing NJP that occurred after you disclosed preservice drug use and acknowledged the Navy’s drug abuse policy, and your later positive urinalysis. Furthermore, the Board noted that you had the right to have your case heard by an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a more favorable characterization of service. Therefore, the Board concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.



Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
























2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09560-06

    Original file (09560-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 October 1984 you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. You subsequently attended a substance abuse...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10029-06

    Original file (10029-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09210-06

    Original file (09210-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 20 October 1983 you reenlisted in the Navy at age 22 after a period of prior honorable service. On...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02648-08

    Original file (02648-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00420-08

    Original file (00420-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 August 1988, you received a substance abuse evaluation during which you admitted using marijuana about once every other month. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04498-08

    Original file (04498-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 October 1985, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The Board also noted that your case was initially heard by an ADB, which recommended a general discharge, but that action was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06875-07

    Original file (06875-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 26 February 1986, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 27 after two prior periods of honorable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04399-07

    Original file (04399-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 19 September 1983, you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. In connection with this processing, you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07886-08

    Original file (07886-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4768 13

    Original file (NR4768 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member: panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your commanding officer, in concurrence with the ADB, also recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...